Human endometrial cell coculture reduces the endocrine disruptor toxicity on mouse embryo development
© Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 March 2011
Accepted: 14 March 2012
Published: 30 April 2012
Previous studies suggested that endocrine disruptors (ED) are toxic on preimplantation embryos and inhibit development of embryos in vitro culture. However, information about the toxicity of endocrine disruptors on preimplantation development of embryo in human reproductive environment is lacking.
Bisphenol A (BPA) and Aroclor 1254 (polychlorinated biphenyls) were used as endocrine disruptors in this study. Mouse 2-cell embryos were cultured in medium alone or vehicle or co-cultured with human endometrial epithelial layers in increasing ED concentrations.
At 72 hours the percentage of normal blastocyst were decreased by ED in a dose-dependent manner while the co-culture system significantly enhanced the rate and reduced the toxicity of endocrine disruptors on the embryonic development in vitro.
In conclusion, although EDs have the toxic effect on embryo development, the co-culture with human endometrial cell reduced the preimplantation embryo from it thereby making human reproductive environment protective to preimplantation embryo from the toxicity of endocrine disruptors.
KeywordsBisphenol A Aroclor 1254 Mouse embryo Human endometrial cells Endocrine disruptors
Endocrine disruptors are man made chemicals that have been shown to affect reproduction in wild life and may have adverse effects on humans [1–3]. Bisphenol A (BPA) is an important monomer used in the manufacture of a large number of chemicals and products, including epoxy and polystyrene resins that are used frequently in the food-packaging industry and in dentistry. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a family of 209 highly stable synthetic congeners, were used for a decade in a wide range of industrial applications, due to their excellent flame retardant, lubricant, and electrical insulating properties.
Human exposure to these chemicals is significant. BPA have been detected in liquid from canned vegetables  and in the saliva of patients treated with dental sealants . The wide spread use and high chemical stability make PCBs ubiquitous and persistent in nature and their high lipophilicity causes these compounds to bio-accumulate, with the food chain being the main route of exposure. Especially, embryos, fetuses and newborns are highly susceptible to the exposure of these chemicals, which highlights the developmental toxicity of the compounds [6, 7]. Further examples of exposure of human endometrium to the endocrine disruptors was demonstrated elsewhere although the levels were negligible . Individual congener and total PCB concentrations were determined in serum (819–2627 pg/g whole weight) and follicular fluid (303–1257 pg/g whole weight) obtained from women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement) .
Endometrium is the main target for estrogens besides the breast, the pituitary, and the hypothalamus, and thus endometrium could be a useful tissue for evaluating the relevance of environmental estrogen exposure. Endometrial tissue is vital to important biological processes such as implantation and embryonic to blastocyst development, and disturbances in the function of this organ can lead to reduced fertility .
Embryos might be more sensitive to the endocrine disruptors than fetuses because preimplantation exposure might cause direct contact of endocrine disruptors that had entered maternal tissues, without placental barriers . However, there remains a lack of knowledges about development of preimplantation embryos at the earliest stages in the presence of endocrine disruptors on human endometrium. So far, monolayers of purified epithelial cells or polarized epithelial cells have been used to investigate the effects of various materials on embryo development [11, 12]. In a recent study, it was found that BPA partly affects implantation sites and alter the expression of implantation-associated genes . Berger RG et. al. also showed that BPA exposure disrupts intrauterine implantation during early gestation . However, the effects of BPA or BCP on the development of mouse embryos in presence or absence of human endrometrium epithelial cell have not been evaluated which can be interesting to understand the protective effect of embryos in cohort of co-culture system in vivo. In this study, we investigated the effects of two known endocrine disruptors, BPA or Aroclor 1254 (a commercial PCB; contains biphenyls with approximately 54% chlorine) on the development of mouse embryos (2-cells) co-cultured on human endometrial epithelial cell (hEEC) monolayers as an in vivo model by examination of dose dependency on embryo development.
Human endometrial epithelial (hEEC) cell culture
To study the development of mouse embryos under toxic exposure and their protective measures in vitro, toxic endocrine disruptors such as BPA or Arocolor-1245 were used on mouse embryos. Therefore, this study was first approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Soonchunhyang University Hospital, South Korea (IRB no. SCH 2009–36).
Retrieval of mouse 2-cell embryos and Endocrine disruptor treatments
A total of 149 mice were used in this study, 75 of which for PCB and 74 for BCP. Five-week-old ICR female mice (from Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Korea) were injected with 10 IU of intraperitoneal pregnant mare serum gonadotropin and with 10 IU intraperitoneal human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) 48 hrs later. They were impregnated overnight by 12-week-old males of the same strain. Mating was ascertained by the appearance of a vaginal plug on the following morning. Female mice were killed at 48 hr after hCG administration by cervical dislocation and mouse 2-cell embryos were flushed from the oviducts.
Ki square test was performed on the data in order to determine significant differences (P < 0.05) between the treatment (media contains a series of increasing concentrations of endocrine disruptors) and control (not treated with any of the endocrine disruptors; i.e. - media contains null/zero concentration of endocrine disruptors) groups.
The effect of coculture on development of mouse embryos in increasing Bisphenol A
Embryos grown on*
Total number of embryos
Number of blastocysts
The effect of coculture on development of mouse embryos in increasing Aroclor 1254 concentrations
Total number of embryos
Number of blastocysts
Effect of BPA
From Table 1 it was clear that BPA at 10−4 M concentrations had the greatest detrimental effect on the development of embryos at 72 hour of culture. No blastocyst was observed in case of both medium alone and vehicle and only 50% blastocysts were observed for coculture system (p < 0.05). It was also evident that when the concentration of BPA was increased, the total number of blastocysts was also decreased. However, coculture with hEEC monolayers was found to be beneficial because the decreasing rate of blastocysts number was much smaller than that of the medium or vehicle (Table 1).
Effect of Aroclor 1254
Similar dose dependent effect of Aroclor 1254 at different concentrations was observed on embryonic development in Table 2. The detrimental effect of Aroclor 1254 on embryonic development was found to be increasing with the increase of concentration in all treatment groups at 72 hour. Especially, 1 μg/ml Aroclor 1254 showed the most detrimental effect. In this concentration only 43% blastocysts were observed for co-culture system, but none for media alone and vehicle (P < 0.05). Also in this case, co-culture was found beneficial by decreasing the rate of detrimental effect Aroclor 1254 on embryonic development (Table 2). Thus these results showed that the hEEC coculture alleviated the toxicity of BPA or Aroclor 1254 on the embryonic development, especially in the high dose.
Three different types of cells, e.g. – the epithelium, the endometrial stroma and the myometrium, are known to found in mammalian uterus. The differentiation of endometrial epithelia is considered important regarding successful embryonic development, placentation or embryo implantation. But due to environmental pollution and extensive distribution of PCBs in the ecosystem, endometrial cells have over exposed to these carcinogenic chemicals and several studies have reported the detrimental effects PCBs on animal reproduction systems. In human beings, complications such as reduced birth weight, diminished head circumference and reduced gestational age have been reported to occur due to maternal consumption of PCB contaminated fish [17, 18]. Among various chemical formulations, BPA and Aroclor 1254 are the known endocrine disruptors of the PCB family.
To date, several studies have indicated that BPA mimics estrogen and 10−8 to 10−6 M BPA exerts estrogenic effects on various kind of cells in vitro [10, 14, 19] and over 10−5 M BPA is cytotoxic . On the other hand, one to 10 μg/ml Aroclor 1254 was found cytotoxic [21–23].
In this study, endocrine disruptors decreased the developmental rates of embryos by dose dependency (Table 1, 2). Takai et al . have shown that BPA significantly decreased the developmental rate of two-cell mouse embryos to blastocysts in vitro. Kholkute et al. [21, 22] examined the effect of Aroclor 1254 on the development of 2-cell embryos to the 4-cell stage at 48 hr. They found that increasing the concentration of Aroclor 1254 in the culture medium significantly reduced the progression of 2-cell embryos to the 4-cell stage or greater at 48 hr. Also, the presence of Aroclor 1254 reduced both the in vitro fertilization rates and embryonic development in mice. The results demonstrated that increasing concentrations of BPA or Aroclor 1254 had a deleterious effect directly on embryonic development.
During the blastulation, differentiation events were occurred and contact-induced cell polarization and reorganization of cytoskeletal elements were expressed. In this study, the blastulation at 72 hr in the medium alone and vehicle was not observed at 10−4 M (BPA) or 1 μg/ml (Aroclor 1254). It might be due to the fact that the chemicals have aneuploidogenic properties that inhibit MT assembly in intact cells. Pfeiffer et al.  demonstrated by staining with anti-centromere antibodies that all micronuclei in V79 cells induced by BPA contained whole chromatids/chromosomes, suggesting that BPA does not induce DNA breakage. Tsutsui et al.  reported that BPA exerted transforming and genotoxic effects on cultured syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells and the DNA adduct formation observed in cultured SHE cells treated with BPA was involved in non-disjunction, leading to aneuploidy. Takai et al.  demonstrated that embryos that did not reach the blastocyst stage at 48 hrs were largely in the morula stage, although the percentage of degenerated embryos was significantly increased in the 10−4 M BPA-exposed group. Hernandez and Dukelow reported that the morula was more susceptible to the toxic effect of Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1254 could affect the development of the embryos by reducing the number of gap junctions . Several other studies indicate that even human endometrial cells are susceptible to the exposure of ED [27, 28]. In this study, BPL and Aroclor 1254 might have some toxic effect on hEEC too, but co-culturing mouse embryos with hEEC monolayer cells is advantageous.
The beneficial effects of co-culture include the secretion of embryotrophic factors such as nutrients and substrates, growth factors and cytokines and the removal of potentially harmful substances such as heavy metals, ammonium, and free radical formation, detoxifying the culture medium . In this study, the co-culture with hEECs increased the percentages of blastocyst in all treatments. However, it should be noted that the total cell in co-culture system might be higher than that of the medium alone or vehicle. Therefore, decreasing the BPA or Arocolor-1245 concentration in the co-culture system might have a reduced toxic effect as compared with medium alone or vehicle culturing. In other cases, bio-transformation of these chemicals causes bio-accumulation in increased concentrations.
Because of ethical and legal issues, an in vitro model was used to elucidate the impacts of endocrine disruptors on embryonic development. The results should be considered in light of the limitations of an in vitro model. In addition, mouse embryos were used rather than human embryos. Nevertheless, the results from this study were useful in evaluating impacts of endocrine disruptors at the human endometrial-embryonic interface.
In conclusion, increasing concentrations of BPA or Aroclor 1254 had a deleterious effect directly on embryonic development. This suggests that the endocrine disruptors, BPA and Aroclor 1254 might dose dependently reduce the embryo development on reproductive environment. However, in this study, we showed mouse endometrial cell coculture reduced the toxicities of BPA and Aroclor 1254 on preimplantation development of embryos and this suggests that reproductive environment protects preimplantation embryo from the toxicity of endocrine disruptor.
- Colborn T, vom Saal FS, Soto AM: Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ Health Perspect 1993, 101: 378–384. 10.1289/ehp.93101378PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daston GP, et al.: Environmental estrogen and reproductive health: a discussion of the human and environmental data. Reprod Toxicol 1997, 11: 465–481. 10.1016/S0890-6238(97)00014-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonnenschein C, Soto AM: An updated review of environmental estrogen and androgen mimics and antagonists. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998, 65: 143–150. 10.1016/S0960-0760(98)00027-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brotons JA, et al.: Xenoestrogens released from lacquer coatings in food cans. Environ Health Perspect 1995, 103: 608–612. 10.1289/ehp.95103608PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olea N, et al.: Estrogenicity of resin-base composites and sealants used in dentistry. Environ Health Perspect 1996, 104: 298–305. 10.1289/ehp.96104298PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JC, et al.: Evaluation of developmental toxicity in rats exposed to the environmental estrogen bisphenol A during pregnancy. Life Sci 2001, 69: 2611–2625. 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01341-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coletti D, et al.: Polychlorobiphenys inhibit skeletal muscle differentiation in culture. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001, 175: 226–233. 10.1006/taap.2001.9237View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaefer WR, et al.: Exposure of human endometrium to environmental estrogens, antiandrogens, and organochlorine compounds. Fertil Steril 2000, 74: 558–563. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00704-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pauwels A, et al.: The relation between levels of selected PCB congeners in human serum and follicular fluid. Chemosphere 1999, 39: 2433–2441. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00170-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takai Y, et al.: Estrogen receptor-mediated effects of a xenoestrogen, bisphenol A, on preimplantation mouse embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000, 270: 918–921. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2548View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrasco I, Cebral E, Benitez R, Vantman D: Hydrosalpinx fluid affects murine embryonic development in a coculture system with epithelial endometrial cells. Fertil Steril 2001, 75: 1004–1008. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01683-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valbuena D, et al.: Increasing levels of estradiol are deterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril 2001, 76: 962–968. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02018-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varayoud J, Ramos JG, Bosquiazzo VL, Lower M, Munoz-de-Toro M, Luque EH: Neonatal exposure to bisphenol A alters rat uterine implantation-associated gene expression and reduces the number of implantation sites. Endocrinology 2011,152(3):1101–1111. 10.1210/en.2009-1037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berger RG, Foster WG, de Catanzaro D: Bisphenol-A exposure during the period of blastocyst implantation alters uterine morphology and perturbs measures of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in mice. Reprod Toxicol 2010,30(3):393–400. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.06.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryan IP, Schriock ED, Taylor RN: Isolation, characterization, and comparison of human endometrial and endometriosis cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994, 78: 642–649. 10.1210/jc.78.3.642PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pierro E, et al.: Stromal-epithelial interactions modulate estrogen responsiveness in normal human endometrium. Biol Reprod 2001, 64: 831–838. 10.1095/biolreprod64.3.831View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fein GG, et al.: Prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls: effects on birth size and gestational age. J Pediatr 1984, 105: 315–320. 10.1016/S0022-3476(84)80139-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swain WR: Effects of organochlorine chemicals on the reproductive outcome of humans who consumed contaminated great lake fish: an epidemiological consideration. J Toxicol Environ Health 1991, 33: 587–639. 10.1080/15287399109531541View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krishnan A, et al.: Bisphenol-A: an estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclaving. Endocrinology 1993, 132: 2279–2286. 10.1210/en.132.6.2279PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawa Y, Tayama S: Metabolism and cytotoxicity of bisphenol A and other bisphenols in isolated rat hepatocytes. Arch Toxicol 2000, 74: 99–105. 10.1007/s002040050659View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kholkute SD, Rodriguez J, Dukelow WR: Reproductive toxicology of Aroclor-1254: effects on oocyte, spermatozoa, in vitro fertilization, and embryo development in the mouse. Reprod Toxicol 1994, 8: 487–493. 10.1016/0890-6238(94)90031-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kholkute SD, Rodriguez J, Dukelow WR: Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) on in vitro fertilization in the mouse. Reprod Toxicol 1994, 8: 69–73. 10.1016/0890-6238(94)90069-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez O, Dukelow WR: Aroclor-1254 effects on the in vitro development of 8-cell mouse embryos. Bul Environ Contam Toxicol 1998, 60: 773–780. 10.1007/s001289900693View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pfeiffer E, Rosenberg B, Deuschel S, Metzler M: Interference with microtubules and induction of micronuclei in vitro by various bisphenols. Mut Res 1997, 390: 21–31. 10.1016/S0165-1218(96)00161-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsutui T, et al.: Bisphenol-A induces cellular transformation, aneuploidy and DNA adduct formation in cultured Syrian hamster embryo cells. Int J Cancer 1998, 75: 290–294. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980119)75:2<290::AID-IJC19>3.0.CO;2-HView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takai Y, et al.: Preimplantation exposure to bisphenol A advances postnatal development. Reprod Toxicol 2001, 15: 71–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aghajanova L, Giudice LC: Effect of bisphenol A on human endometrial stromal fibroblasts in vitro. Reprod Biomed Online 2011,22(3):249–56. Epub 2010 Dec 23 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bredhult C, Backlin BM: Olovsson M Effects of some endocrine disruptors on the proliferation and viability of human endometrial endothelial cells in vitro. Reprod Toxicol 2007,23(4):550–559. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.03.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bavister BD: Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995, 1: 91–148. 10.1093/humupd/1.2.91View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.