Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression predicting intention (cross-sectional)

From: Intention as an indicator for subjective need: A new pathway in need assessment

Male teachers (n = 339)
  model M1 model M2 model M3
Variables included OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Age (45+) .5 (.3 -.8) .5 (.3 -.8) .4 (.2 -.7)
Marital status (MS) .9 (.5 - 1.7) .6 (.3 - 1.3) . 6 (.3 - 1.3)
Children at home (CH) 1.3 (.8 - 2.3) 1.00 (.6 - 1.8) 1.0 (.6 - 1.9)
MS X CH1   .3 (.1-1.0) .3 (.1 - 1.1)
GHQ-12 (1/2)    1.2 (.6 - 2.3)
(1/3)    1.1 (.5 - 2.3)
MBI-EE (1/2)    1.4 (.7 - 2.7)
(1/3)    2.2 (1.0 - 4.7)
  -2LL: 371.7 -2LL: 367.9 -2LL: 361.0
  Δ CHI2: 9.0 Δ CHI2: 3.9 Δ CHI2: 6.9
  p = .03 (df = 3) p = .05 (df = 1) p = .14 (df = 4)
Nagelkerkes R2 .04 .06 .09
Hosmer-Lemeshow-Test CHI2: 4.2 CHI2: .1 CHI2: 13.5
  p = .52 (df = 5) p = .99 (df = 4) p = .09 (df = 8)
Female teachers (n = 602)
Variables included OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Age (45+) .7 (.5 - .9) .7 (.5 - .9) .6 (.4 - .8)
Marital status (MS) 1.4 (1.0 - 2.1) 1.4 (.6 - 2.2) 1.2 (.7 - 1.9)
Children at home (CH) 1.6 (.9 - 1.8) 1.2 (.8 - 1.9) 1.2 (.8 - 2.0)
MS X CH1   .9 (.4 - 1.9) .8 (.4 - 1.7)
GHQ-12 (1/2)    1.8 (1.1 - 2.8)
(1/3)    2.0 (1.2 - 3.3)
MBI-EE (1/2)    1.3 (.8 - 2.0)
(1/3)    2.6 (1.5 - 4.3)
  -2LL: 764.3 -2LL: 764.2 -2LL: 720.17
  Δ CHI2: 12.1 Δ CHI2: .1 Δ CHI2: 44.0
  p = .01 (df = 3) p = .72 (df = 1) p < .00 (df = 4)
Nagelkerkes R2 .03 .03 .12
Hosmer-Lemeshow-Test CHI2: 2.4 CHI2: 2.1 CHI2: 5.2
  p = .67 (df = 4) p = .83(df = 5) p = .74 (df = 8)
  1. 1 MS X CH: Interaction effect of marital status and children at home