Skip to main content

Table 1 Gaussian prior distributions (mean μ and standard deviation σ) applied in the four analyses.

From: Bayesian bias adjustments of the lung cancer SMR in a cohort of German carbon black production workers

 

Analysis

 

CAREX

Expert

 

smoking cohort

smoking case-control

smoking cohort

smoking case-control

 

1

2

3

4

 

μ

σ

μ

σ

μ

σ

μ

σ

Effect

        

log OR smoke

2.23

1.06

2.23

1.06

2.23

1.06

2.23

1.06

log OR prev

0.74

0.857

0.74

0.857

1.15

0.563

1.15

0.563

Proportions

        

logit prop smoke, pop

0.62

0.0357

0.62

0.0357

0.62

0.0357

0.62

0.0357

logit prop smoke, coh

1.66

0.0794

1.66

0.394

1.66

0.0794

1.66

0.394

logit prop prev, pop

-3.74

0.366

-3.74

0.366

-5.30

0.356

-5.30

0.356

logit prop prev, coh

1.05

0.243

1.05

0.243

-1.16

0.291

-1.16

0.291

  1. One effect specification was used throughout to describe the prior for smoking (log ORsmoke). Two effect specifications were applied to estimate the effect of previous exposures (log ORprev): one was based on CAREX data (Analyses 1 and 2) and a second based on data assessed by a German expert (Analyses 3 and 4). The proportion of male smokers in the population was estimated in all analyses by a representative sample from the male population (logit propsmoke, pop). Two estimates were derived for the cohort percentage (logit propsmoke, coh): one based on cohort data (Analyses 1 and 3) and a second based on case-control information (Analyses 2 and 4). The prevalence of previous occupational exposure to crystalline silica (logit propprev, pop) was estimated by the CAREX system (Analyses 1 and 2) or adapted to fit to the German's expert data (Analyses 3 and 4). The proportion of silica exposed males in the cohort (logit propprev, coh) was derived from CAREX data (Analyses 1 and 2) or from assessments of the German expert (Analyses 3 and 4). For the SMR we always used a flat prior: log SMR ~ N(0,108).