| Analysis |
---|
 |
CAREX
|
Expert
|
 |
smoking cohort
|
smoking case-control
|
smoking cohort
|
smoking case-control
|
 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
 |
μ
|
σ
|
μ
|
σ
|
μ
|
σ
|
μ
|
σ
|
Effect | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
log OR smoke | 2.23 | 1.06 | 2.23 | 1.06 | 2.23 | 1.06 | 2.23 | 1.06 |
log OR prev | 0.74 | 0.857 | 0.74 | 0.857 | 1.15 | 0.563 | 1.15 | 0.563 |
Proportions | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
logit prop smoke, pop | 0.62 | 0.0357 | 0.62 | 0.0357 | 0.62 | 0.0357 | 0.62 | 0.0357 |
logit prop smoke, coh | 1.66 | 0.0794 | 1.66 | 0.394 | 1.66 | 0.0794 | 1.66 | 0.394 |
logit prop prev, pop | -3.74 | 0.366 | -3.74 | 0.366 | -5.30 | 0.356 | -5.30 | 0.356 |
logit prop prev, coh | 1.05 | 0.243 | 1.05 | 0.243 | -1.16 | 0.291 | -1.16 | 0.291 |
- One effect specification was used throughout to describe the prior for smoking (log ORsmoke). Two effect specifications were applied to estimate the effect of previous exposures (log ORprev): one was based on CAREX data (Analyses 1 and 2) and a second based on data assessed by a German expert (Analyses 3 and 4). The proportion of male smokers in the population was estimated in all analyses by a representative sample from the male population (logit propsmoke, pop). Two estimates were derived for the cohort percentage (logit propsmoke, coh): one based on cohort data (Analyses 1 and 3) and a second based on case-control information (Analyses 2 and 4). The prevalence of previous occupational exposure to crystalline silica (logit propprev, pop) was estimated by the CAREX system (Analyses 1 and 2) or adapted to fit to the German's expert data (Analyses 3 and 4). The proportion of silica exposed males in the cohort (logit propprev, coh) was derived from CAREX data (Analyses 1 and 2) or from assessments of the German expert (Analyses 3 and 4). For the SMR we always used a flat prior: log SMR ~ N(0,108).