Skip to main content

Table 2 Management and reporting behaviour of NSSI among hospital healthcare workers, Bale zone, December, 2014

From: Attitude, reporting behavour and management practice of occupational needle stick and sharps injuries among hospital healthcare workers in Bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

Variables

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Ever experienced NSSI at work (n = 340)

  

 Yes

126

37.1

 No

214

62.9

Self management taken after injury (n = 126)

  

 Yes

107

84.9

 No

19

15.1

Type of action taken after injurya

  

 Washed with soap and water

57

53.3

 Washed with iodine or alcohol

45

42.1

 Get tested for HIV

43

40.2

 Take post exposure prophylaxis (PEP)

25

23.4

 Take tetanus anti-toxoid (TAT)

31

29.0

 Squeezing to extract more blood

10

8.5

 Applying pressure to stop bleeding

18

16.8

Ever reported NSSI to concerned body (n = 126)

  

 Yes

52

41.3

 No

74

58.7

Time of injury reported (n = 52)

  

 Immediately after injury

49

94.2

 Late before going off work place

2

3.8

 After two days of injury

1

1.9

Reasons for not reported injurya

  

 Being too busy at the time of injury

26

35.1

 Sharps caused injury never used on patient

20

27.0

 Used on patient but was not disease of concern

15

20.3

 They did not know as they should report

11

14.9

 They did not know how to report

7

9.5

 Their colleagues told them not to worry

1

1.4

Sought medical care after injury (n = 126)

  

 Yes

63

50.0

 No

63

50.0

Treatment given (n = 63)

  

 Tested for different diseases

15

23.8

 Pre-test counselling

4

6.3

 Post-test counselling

19

30.2

 PEP was given and follow-up started

25

39.7

  1. aEach of the percentages does not add up to 100 % because respondents could choose several responses which could be more than one