Skip to main content

Table 3 Methodological assessment of included studies

From: Influence of the Kinaesthetics care conception during patient handling on the development of musculoskeletal complaints and diseases – A scoping review

Study

Reporting quality

Internal validity

External validity

Betschon et al., 2014 [45]

HR

HR

HR

Buge & Mahler, 2004 [50]

LR

HR

LR

Christen et al., 2002 [46]

UR

HR

HR

Eisenschink et al., 2003 [47]

HR

UR

HR

Friess-Ott & Müller, 2006 [53]

HR

HR

HR

Hock-Rummelhardt, 2013 [57]

LR

HR

HR

Huth et al., 2013 [55]

LR

LR

NA

Lenker, 2008 [51]

HR

HR

HR

Maietta & Resch-Kröll, 2009 [49]

HR

HR

HR

Rettenberger & Schoenemeier, 2005 [52]

HR

HR

HR

Sedlak-Emperer, 2012 [56]

UR

HR

LR

Steinwidder & Lohrmann, 2008 [54]

HR

HR

UR

Tamminen-Peter, 2006 [48]

UR

HR

HR

  1. General questions for each category
  2. Reporting quality—Were important key points reported?
  3. Internal validity—Are study results valid?
  4. External validity—Are study results generalizable?
  5. Abbreviations: HR high risk of bias, LR low risk of bias, NA not applicable, UR unclear risk of bias