Potential influence factor | Students’ assessment of the increase of the attractiveness of commuting (0 = no increase, + 1 = slight increase, + 2 = medium increase, + 3 = strong increase, + 4 = very strong increase) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Male | Female | p* | GP career preferred | Others | p* | |
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
Working time | |||||||
To work full-time | 0.9 ± 1.3 | 1.1 ± 1.4 | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.003 | 1.0 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ± 1.3 | 0.882 |
To work full-time, but compressed to 3½ days per week | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 0.984 | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 0.044 |
To work part-time (less working days per week) | 1.9 ± 1.3 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 0.005 |
To work part-time (reduced daily working time) | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 1.1 ± 1.2 | 1.5 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 | 1.9 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
Job sharing with colleagues (2 days per week rural, 3 days in big city) | 1.9 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0.002 | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0.954 |
Existence of an adequate accommodation option | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 0.012 | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 0.723 |
Defined time limit for the job (e.g. 5 years) | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 0.915 | 1.1 ± 1.2 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 0.243 |
Remuneration | |||||||
Time getting to work is paid as working time, additional to it | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0.876 | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0.683 |
Time getting to work is paid as working time, included into it | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 3.0 ± 1.1 | 0.266 | 3.0 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0.334 |
Time getting to work is utilizable for organizational tasks | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 1.9 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 0.048 | 1.9 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 1.2 | 0.174 |
Remuneration is significantly higher than in the big city | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 0.647 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 0.436 |
Mode of transport | |||||||
Getting to work by using own car | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 1.4 | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 0.352 | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 0.903 |
Good public transport connection | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | 0.223 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 0.539 |
Organization of a car pool | 1.4 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 1.2 | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 0.017 | 1.4 ± 1.2 | 1.4 ± 1.2 | 0.611 |
A driver service is picking me up (from the doorstep to work, and back) | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 1.9 ± 1.5 | 2.1 ± 1.5 | 0.020 | 1.8 ± 1.6 | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 0.149 |
Assuming the consideration of working office-based: legal structure and organization | |||||||
Working self-employed in a single practice | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 1.5 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 0.024 | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
Working self-employed in a joint practice (2–3 physicians) | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 1.1 | < 0.001 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 |
Working self-employed in a joint practice (4–6 physicians) | 1.7 ± 1.2 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 1.8 ± 1.2 | 0.014 | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 1.7 ± 1.2 | 0.337 |
Working as an employee of another physician (office-based) | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.8 ± 1.0 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ± 1.1 | 0.002 |
Working as an employee of an institution, e.g. municipality or KVa | 1.0 ± 1.1 | 0.9 ± 1.1 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.003 | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 0.9 ± 1.1 | < 0.001 |
Working as an employee of a medical employer, e.g. hospital or medical service center | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 1.2 ± 1.1 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 0.432 |
Mobile surgery (installed in a ‘surgery-bus’, continuous care for several municipalities on different days) | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 0.7 ± 1.0 | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 0.749 | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 0.7 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
Provision of a home-office to be able to do some work at home (e.g. organizational tasks) | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 1.9 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 | 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 0.022 |
Existence of a specifically qualified „supply assistant“, disburdening the physician regarding delegable tasks | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 2.1 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 0.010 | 2.6 ± 1.2 | 2.1 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 |
Home visit patients were, if possible, picked up by a driver service and brought to me | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 1.5 ± 1.3 | 0.245 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 0.926 |