Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between the participants’ demographic and educational characteristics and their knowledge scores

From: An assessment of medical students’ proficiency regarding the hazards of radiological examinations on the health of workers and patients: a cross-sectional study from Palestine

Characteristic

Knowledge score a Median [Q1-Q3]

P-value*

Gender

 Male

12.00 [8.00–15.00]

0.034 b

 Female

10.25 [7.00–13.63]

 

Clinical year

 4th year

8.25 [6.00–10.50]

< 0.001 c

 5th year

10.50 [8.50–14.00]

 

 6th year

13.25 [10.00–16.00]

 

Self-perceived radiology knowledge compared to other subjects

 Excellent

10.50 [8.50–11.75]

< 0.001 c

 Good

11.50 [8.00–15.00]

 

 Average

12.00 [9.00–15.13]

 

 Poor

8.00 [5.25–10.00]

 

 No knowledge

5.25 [2.50–8.00]

 

Received radiology lectures as a part of the anatomy course

 Yes

11.25 [8.25–15.38]

0.412 b

 No

10.50 [8.00–14.00]

 

Received radiology lectures as a part of a clinical skills course

 Yes

11.50 [8.50–14.50]

0.110 b

 No

10.00 [7.50–14.00]

 

Received Radiology lectures during 4th clinical year

 Yes

9.00 [6.50–13.00]

< 0.001 b

 No

12.00 [9.00–15.00]

 

Received Radiology lectures during 5th clinical year

 Yes

12.50 [9.50–15.50]

< 0.001 b

 No

9.00 [6.00–13.00]

 

Received Radiology lectures during 6th clinical year

 Yes

8.00 [3.00- NA]

0.426 b

 No

10.50 [8.00–14.25]

 

Received education on protection from radiation

 Yes

12.00 [8.75–15.00]

0.249 b

 No

10.50 [8.00–14.00]

 
  1. Q1-Q3 Quartile 3, Quartile 3, NA not available
  2. * Significant p-values are in bold
  3. a The overall knowledge score’ range was 0–22, with higher scores corresponding to better knowledge on radiation doses and related hazards
  4. b Statistical significance of differences calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test
  5. c Statistical significance of differences calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test