Table 2 Rating “very great importance” of different maritime welfare facilities
From: Maritime welfare facilities - utilization and relevance for the compensation of shipboard stress
Maritime welfare facilities | Ethnic Group | Ranking | Shipping route | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall study sample n (% of all evaluations) | Euro-pean (147) | South-east Asians (169) | Rating (195) | Officer (121) | North Range (191) | World-wide (125) | |
Seamen’s Missions | 87 (33.5%) | 22 (17.3%) | 65 (48.9%) *** | 64 (40.3%) | 23 (22.8%) *** | 53 (29.8%) | 34 (41.5%) |
Religious facility | 80 (31.1%) | 9 (7.2%) | 71 (53.8%) *** | 68 (43.0%) | 12 (12.1%) *** | 59 (33.1%) | 21 (26.6%) |
Sport Club | 33 (13.2%) | 9 (7.3%) | 24 (19.0%) ** | 23 (15.2%) | 10 (10.1%) | 29 (16.4%) | 4 (5.5%) *** |
Bar | 29 (11.3%) | 12 (9.4%) | 17 (13.2%) | 23 (14.8%) | 6 (5.9%) * | 6 (3.4%) | 23 (29.1%) *** |
Shops | 16 (4.8%) | 10 (6.5%) | 6 (3.4%) | 9 (4.4%) | 7 (5.7%) | 7 (3.5%) | 9 (6.8%) |