Skip to main content

Work-related leukemia: a systematic review


Leukemia is a complex disease, which only became better understood during the last decades following the development of new laboratory techniques and diagnostic methods. Despite our improved understanding of the physiology of the disease, little is yet known about the causes of leukemia. A variety of potential risk factors have been suggested so far, including personal habits and lifestyle, and a wide range of occupational or environmental exposures. A causal association with leukemia has only been documented to date for ionizing radiation, benzene and treatment with cytostatic drugs, but there is an ongoing scientific debate on the possible association of leukemia with a number of other work-related hazards. In this article, we have reviewed scientific studies, published over the past 5 years, which investigated potential associations between leukemia and exposure to occupational risk factors. The systematic literature review took place via electronic databases, using specific search criteria, and independent reviewers have further filtered the search results to identify the number of articles, presented in our paper. A large number of studies included in the review referred to the effects of ionizing radiation, where new data suggest that the effects of exposure to small doses of ionizing radiation should probably be reevaluated. Some other works appear to substantiate a potential association of the disease with certain pesticides. Further research is also suggested regarding the role of infectious agents or exposure to certain chemicals like formaldehyde or butadiene in the pathogenesis of leukemia.



The term "leukemia" refers to a group of diseases with different biological background, clinical presentation, prognosis and response to treatment, characterized by a malignant transformation of hematopoietic cells which produce an abnormal leukemic population (clone) of cells suppressing the production of normal blood cellular components. The disease was first identified in the mid-19th century when different researchers described a common pathology caused by abnormalities of the white blood cells [1], hence the term “Leukemia” which originates from the Greek words “Leuko” (white) and “Haema” (blood). While scientific research has advanced significantly since then as regards to the underlying pathophysiology of the various types of the disease, our knowledge on the causative factors involved in the development of leukemia is still limited.

Different researchers have proposed a number of potential risk factors for leukemia, but to date exposure to ionizing radiation, alkylating agents and benzene [2] remain the only hazards for which an association with leukemia has been substantiated.

An association between ionizing radiation and leukemia was first assumed in the early 20th century, following the effects of uncontrolled exposure of patients and medical personnel to the radiation used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes [1, 3]. Those observations were further corroborated by the findings of Life Span Study (LSS) among the A-Bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki [47], which persist for decades following exposure to radiation [8, 9] and the follow-up studies among cleaning-workers in Chernobyl reactor site [10].

Benzene is according to the current scientific knowledge the second best-documented risk factor for the development of leukemia [11]. Its chemical properties have led to its widespread use as a solvent in a number of industrial applications, and occupational exposure to benzene has been documented for workers in different production sectors i.e. production of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, plastics, synthetic rubbers, paints, oil processing etc. [1214]. Epidemiological studies have shown a significant association between exposure to Benzene and the incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1517].

Cytostatic drugs, and especially chemotherapeutic regimens containing alkylating agents such as Busulfan, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide etc. used in the treatment of solid organ malignancies are another documented risk factor for developing leukemia, as a number of clinical trials on cancer therapeutics has shown an association between this category of drugs and the development of secondary leukemia [18], particularly AML [19]. Despite their known toxicity to oncology patients and the precautionary measures taken to prevent occupational exposure, a number of workers from different disciplines could be exposed to significant concentrations of cytostatic drugs during their production, transportation, distribution, preparation and administration to patients [2022]. Nevertheless, little is known regarding the potential effect of this exposure on the risk of developing the disease [2326].

Taking into account the limited knowledge on its actual causes, the investigation of the role of different work-related risk factors in the development of leukemia would be of great scientific interest, providing valuable insight on the etiology of the disease and the available options for the protection of health of specific categories of workers or the public, given the widespread use of different chemical compounds and technological applications in common consumer products.

The growing number of related publications over the last years indicates an increasing concern of the scientific community and recent studies have presented new information as regards our cumulative experience from the application of different technologies and chemical or biological factors in industry, necessitating a review of the current literature on the subject.

Therefore through this paper we systematically collected and summarized all relevant scientific information that has been published internationally in the English language over the last years, exploring the potential role of occupational "risk factors" in the development of the disease.

Materials and methods

The article review on the role of occupational risk factors in the development of leukemia took place between September and December 2010. The literature search was carried out via the internet, using the online medical database "Pubmed" supported by the US National Library of Medicine and the more generic search-engine "Google Scholar".

The methodology followed by the research team for the selection of articles is presented schematically in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Article selection process for the review. The chart presented in this figure shows the overall process for the selection of articles from the initial electronic search to the final selection of the reviewed studies.

At a first stage, all published articles containing the word "leukemia” as part of their title, as a key-word or as a reference in their full text have been collected.

A set of criteria was adopted to narrow down the search results, excluding studies published more than 5 years prior to the review, studies that referred to subjects younger than 18 years (since the review referred to work-related risk factors) and studies whose full text was not available in English. All types of publications (i.e. prospective or retrospective studies, original articles, literature reviews, meta-analyses etc.) were considered at this stage.

The initial search recovered more than 10.000 articles (629 literature reviews) who were filtered by 2 different reviewers as regards their pertinence to the scopes of the study. The reviewers screened the abstracts of all collected articles and considered for further review only studies that referred to the potential effect of various risk factors (exposures) in the development of leukemia. The occupational or environmental nature of exposure was not examined at this stage. The review investigated information on the potential role of occupational risk factors regardless of the research type (toxicological, molecular, epidemiological study etc.) therefore no selection took place on the basis of specific study design. Nevertheless, with the exception of a number of articles who were further reviewed to elucidate potential points of interest, the overwhelming majority of clinical trials and laboratory studies were clearly non-relevant to the context of the review and were directly excluded, limiting the number of articles at the end of second phase to 278.

For the final selection process the remaining articles were examined in detail by both reviewers. In cases of agreement, the corresponding articles were either excluded or included in the final list, while in cases of ambiguity there was further discussion among the 2 reviewers and a third reviewer who played the role of a referee, in order to reach consensus.

Articles considered eligible for inclusion were those that referred to specific categories of workers or exposure to occupational hazards and their effect on leukemia. The role of environmental exposures on leukemia was beyond the scope of this paper and all related studies were subsequently excluded.

A limited number of the reviewed articles on ionizing radiation and benzene did not refer specifically to occupational exposure, but their findings were considered significant for understanding the role of those hazards in occupational settings and were thus included in the final list. Finally, while leukemia in children was beyond the objectives of this study, the effect of parental occupational exposure on the risk of the disease among their offspring was considered work-related and therefore similar studies were also included in the final review.

The 71 final studies, along with their main findings are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3 classified according to the author, year, type of study and type of exposure. Table 1 presents the reviewed articles on physical hazards, Table 2 presents articles on chemical and biological hazards and Table 3 refers to others types of hazards and specific categories of workers.

Table 1 Reviewed articles on physical hazards and leukemia
Table 2 Reviewed articles on chemical and biological hazards and leukemia
Table 3 Reviewed articles on other hazards and leukemia

Main findings

Ionizing radiation

As anticipated, the largest proportion of studies referred to ionizing radiation, which is to date the best documented risk factor for leukemia.

An update of Life Span Study findings has shown that exposure to ionizing radiation at doses as low as those usually recorded in occupational settings, leukemia incidence follows a quadratic dose response pattern, which peaks about 10 years following exposure and persists for decades [6, 9]. Moreover, there is uncertainty on whether the proposed safety limits from the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) are appropriate, since revised LSS data show that the risk of leukemia remains increased even in groups with low cumulative exposure to radiation while most of the existing studies do not have sufficient statistical power to identify existing associations at such low exposure levels [98, 99].

Ongoing observations on the impact of Chernobyl accident have shown that predictions based on LSS data present a high margin of error [100]. To date, a statistically significant increase of leukemia incidence has only been observed among the cleaning personnel that worked around the reactor site after the accident [29, 30]. The study of Abramenko et al on specific genetic variants of CLL among this group of workers [28] implies a potential association among exposure to radiation and CLL which warrants further investigation given the lack of supporting evidence from previous studies.

As regards to a potential excess risk of leukemia among workers in the nuclear industry, the results of recent studies remain inconclusive. A number of studies among workers in nuclear-weapon industry have produced negative results [3237] and despite sporadic positive findings, no significantly increased risk of leukemia has been established to date for nuclear power plant personnel [38, 98, 99] and other categories of workers involved in other industrial applications of ionizing radiation (medicine, research laboratories, non-destructive testing etc.) [39, 40, 43].

Exposure to minimal doses of radiation during the mining and processing of uranium has not been associated with a significantly increased risk of leukemia among exposed workers [45, 46]. Moreover, despite existing weaknesses in their methodological design and statistical power [101], recent studies did not record any statistically significant increase in leukemia risk among military personnel exposed to depleted uranium products during military operations [44, 102].

Non-ionizing radiation (EMF)

Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) constitutes an area of ongoing scientific debate over the recent years, mainly because of the rising public health concern regarding EMF. There has been high inconsistency among the results of previous studies, but the research group of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) concluded that existing literature on EMF exposure converges on the existence of a small but statistically significant increase in leukemia risk among occupationally exposed groups [47]. These findings were further supported by more recent studies, which identified a small but statistically significant excess risk of leukemia among workers highly exposed to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF EMF) [47, 48].


Among various chemical exposures in the workplace, Benzene is a well-documented risk factor for leukemia. As regards the potential toxicity of Benzene at cellular level, Zhang et al have observed in vitro a significantly higher number of genetic lesions associated with chemotherapy-related leukemia among Benzene-exposed workers [49], while Richardson et al have proposed a model of two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) of cancer cells where Benzene acts as a promoter (rather than an initiator) affecting the kinetics of initiated blood cells [50]. A recent study in Great Britain estimated that due to the widespread use of benzene-containing compounds in various applications, occupational exposure to Benzene is responsible for about 0.19% of the overall incidence of non-lymphocytic leukemia in men and 0.34% in women [51], while a similar study in Korea has shown that Benzene constitutes at population-level a more significant occupational risk factor for leukemia than ionizing radiation [103].

Other organic solvents

Most epidemiological studies on occupational exposure to organic solvents other from Benzene have not investigated exposure to each compound separately, therefore the effect of co-exposure to benzene in the observed excess risk of leukemia could not be ruled out [52, 53]. In a single study where exposure to organic solvents (Toluene, Hexane, Acetone, and Methyl-ethyl-ketone) was investigated independently from Benzene, no significantly increased risk of leukemia has been observed among the exposed workers [54].

Butadiene and dimethyl-dithio-carbamate

An interesting finding that warrants further research has occurred from a series of studies conducted on workers in the synthetic rubber industry, where a statistically significant excess risk of CML and CLL following a dose-response relationship was shown among workers exposed to 1.3-butadiene (BD) and dimethyl-dithio-carbamate (DMDTC) [57, 59]. Interestingly, a similar finding was not observed among female workers, although their cumulative exposure to the specific compounds had been much smaller than men [60, 61].


Although formaldehyde has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Group 1 “Carcinogenic to Humans” as regards to other types of malignancies [104, 105], a potential role in the development of leukemia remains an area of ongoing scientific controversy, as epidemiological findings remain inconclusive [62, 106] and no plausible theory has been proposed to date to explain a toxic effect on progenitors of blood cells [107]. In 2 recent Meta-analyzes of relevant studies however, a statistically significant excess risk of leukemia has been observed among those occupationally exposed to formaldehyde [108, 109], while despite the criticism over its methodological weaknesses [110] an additional study has shown a statistically significant dose–response association between exposure to formaldehyde and mortality from myeloid leukemia among embalmers [63]. As regards the elucidation of the potential role of formaldehyde in the pathogenesis of leukemia, Zhang et al have reported in vitro evidence of formaldehyde myelotoxicity and identification of leukemia-characteristic genetic lesions among the myeloid lineage of formaldehyde-exposed workers [64], although there have been major objections to their findings by a different group of researchers [65]. Overall, while existing data could provide some explanation for the potential toxicity of Formaldehyde in remote target-organs and the negative findings in experimental animals, it seems that there is still a long way when it comes to document a role of Formaldehyde in the pathogenesis of leukemia [111].


The toxic effects of exposure to Lead on bone marrow have long been recognized. However, the cohort study of Lam et al. among lead-exposed workers (metal construction, metal processing, battery manufacture, glass production and electronics’ industry) has not detected any significant increase of leukemia risk [66].


Pesticides are a class of chemicals long suspected for carcinogenicity, and a number of different studies have been conducted over the last decade to investigate the toxic effect of specific classes of pesticides or compounds and their potential role in the development of leukemia. With the exception of an Italian case-control study which has shown no significant association between leukemia risk and exposure to the main categories of pesticides [69], a number of studies have recorded statistically significant excess risk of leukemia among agricultural workers exposed to pesticides in general [73, 77], or specific categories of pesticides such as Phenoxy-herbicides, Triazine herbicides, Arsenic-containing pesticides, Atrazine, Lindane, Dichloro Diphenyl Trichloroethane (DDT), etc. [70, 75]. A positive association was also shown between leukemia and exposure to organophosphate pesticide Fonofos [67], while for workers exposed to thio-carbamate herbicide EPTC [72], Organochlorine insecticides [71], Metribuzin [74] and Permethrin [76] no statistically significant excess leukemia risk was found.

Infectious agents – contact with animals

The potential association of leukemia with exposure to infectious agents is not a new theory but there seems to be a renewed interest as regards to the epidemiological investigation of this hypothesis during the last decade. A number of epidemiological studies have investigated the existing risk of leukemia among specific occupational groups in livestock farming, food production and processing where a higher theoretical risk of exposure to biological agents from the animal population exists [112114]. The findings of those studies support the above hypothesis, as a statistically significant increase of leukemia risk was shown for workers in livestock farming [77, 115], and a number of occupations i.e. workers in slaughterhouses, butchers, cooks, etc. involved in the processing of animal meat products [7880].

Specific occupational groups at risk

Of the published epidemiological studies that investigated potential associations of leukemia with specific occupational groups over the last 5 years, a statistically significant increase in mortality from leukemia has been recorded among the personnel of chemical laboratories [84] and oil processing facilities [86], while no increased risk for leukemia was shown for firefighters [85] and tannery workers [88]. In 2 epidemiological studies conducted among healthcare personnel, no increased risk for leukemia was shown for the group of nurses [81] and neurosurgeons [83] while the findings of a third study which has shown increased mortality from CLL among nurses may be strongly affected by overdiagnosis of the disease due to the increased health awareness of the specific group [82]. Furthermore, a number of ecological-design studies have recorded a statistically significant excess risk of leukemia among specific categories of workers which include women (other than nurses) working in the healthcare sector [89], workers whose tasks involve exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and printing inks [91], workers exposed to benzene or pesticides or working near high voltage lines [92], workers in plastic production, cleaning and construction work [93], and several categories of workers in the agricultural sector i.e. fruit and vegetable growers, nursery workers, farmers, florists etc. [93].

Parental occupational exposure and childhood leukemia

With regards to the potential association of childhood leukemia with parental occupational exposure, paternal exposure to pesticides and herbicides has not been associated with increased risk [94]. The study of Pearce et al has shown a potential association of paternal exposure to EMF with childhood leukemia, but their findings could be the effect of co-exposure to ionizing radiation [95]. Finally, paternal exposure to carcinogens [97] and maternal exposure to solvents [96] especially during pregnancy and after birth have been associated with increased risk of childhood leukemia among their offspring.


The studies included in this literature review, present the current scientific knowledge on the potential effect of work-related hazards in the pathogenesis of leukemia. It must be noted, a number of those studies suffer from methodological weaknesses which in certain cases constitute their findings precarious.

Given the relatively low incidence and the long natural history of the disease, the investigation of a potential effect of an occupational exposure on leukemia requires large-scale cohort studies with long follow-up period to acquire the necessary statistical strength, which usually exceeds the resources or the size of the study cohort. Even when the above conditions are met, the statistical strength of a study can be significantly reduced if the study protocol for the assessment of exposure contains flaws. The establishment of the role of an occupational hazard in the development of leukemia assumes the demonstration of both a statistically significant impact on leukemia incidence or mortality between the exposed and non-exposed as well as a dose-response effect for different levels of exposure. In cases where available data on personal exposure is insufficient, as appears to be the case for a number of the cohort studies included in this review, an over- or under-estimation of exposure in certain groups of workers may have led to non-differential misclassification, reducing their statistical strength below the point where a weak (but existing) statistical association could be identified.

Case-control studies were susceptible to even more types of error, since apart from misclassification bias as regards the exposure (or the diagnosis, especially in studies based on historical records) major types of systematic error could undermine the reliability of their findings. Most case-control studies took place long after exposure, and the possibility of recall-bias, leading to an erroneous estimation of exposure, is high. Recall-bias could introduce a major error in the results of the studies especially when it is unevenly distributed among cases and controls (e.g. studies where exposure assessment was based on indirect information given by close relatives of colleagues of leukemia patients). Furthermore, some of the studies may have been affected by selection bias either as a result of a change in the composition of their reference population (e.g. migration of leukemia patients for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes outside a country may have led to over-representation of lower socio-economic classes and specific occupational groups among cases) or the over-representation of protective health behaviors among controls due to the followed sampling methodology.

A major concern with regards to published literature reviews and meta-analyses was the low comparability among the studies they were based on, as their different methodological design, analytical methods and presentation of results, made even simple comparisons among their findings difficult, let alone further processing of the data for the purpose of meta-analysis. This has affected some of the findings presented in this review, as some of the meta-analyses, as admitted by their own authors, could have reached completely different results if some of the large-scale studies which have been excluded from the analysis had met the criteria for inclusion.

Overall, during the reference period of this study there have not been any radical changes in the existing scientific knowledge as regards the role of work-related hazards in the pathogenesis of leukemia.

The findings of the reviewed articles confirm or fail to negate previous scientific observations on the effect of known risk factors, and there is adequate consistency among researchers as to the causal association between ionizing radiation or benzene and leukemia. Nevertheless, the results of different studies remain contradictory as regards the effect of radiation on different occupational groups, and the impact on leukemia risk at different exposure levels. Regarding exposure to benzene as a single compound, or as part of mixtures of solvents, the findings are consistent as to a positive association with the risk of leukemia among exposed workers, yet no agreement exists on its exact role on the development of the disease.

The epidemiological findings of different studies remain contradictory on the role of most of the remaining suggested risk factors. The positive associations shown by a number of studies as regards occupational exposure to EMF, BD or infectious agents warrant further research in the future, as different researchers fail to reproduce their statistically significant results. In the case of formaldehyde apart from the inconsistency of epidemiological findings as regards the effect on leukemia among exposed workers, there is also a scientific debate as to the plausibility of a theoretical model of action explaining its role in the development of the disease. Finally, the reviewed studies on occupational exposure to a number of plant protection products (pesticides, herbicides, insecticides) indicate a large heterogeneity among this group of chemical compounds as regards their potential effect on the risk of leukemia, and could provide an adequate explanation for the low reproducibility of findings among different researchers when characterization of exposure is not clearly defined.

The number of collected articles (especially cohort studies) investigating the potential association between different occupational hazards and leukemia, published during the previous years, indicates a growing scientific interest in the specific field in an attempt to improve our understanding on the causal factors of the disease. Nevertheless, based on the reviewed studies the potential effect of those hazards on the observed incidence and mortality of leukemia, if existing, is expected to be so subtle that could easily go unnoticed by small- or medium-scale epidemiological studies. Therefore, even negative results should be evaluated with caution, pending additional information from ongoing research.

Technology has provided new tools to researchers during the last decades for in vitro investigation of diseases like leukemia at cellular or molecular level. This will be perhaps the key to unraveling the pathophysiological mechanisms of this complex disease and acquire new insight on the actual causes of leukemia in the future, since epidemiology appears to have reached its limits as regards to introducing new knowledge in this field.

It is possible that, for diseases such as leukemia, the day when classical epidemiology will give its place to environmental genomics or proteomics to investigate complex interactions between occupational or environmental exposures and their effect at genetic or molecular level, is not far from today.



Relative risk


Excess relative risk




Life span study


Acute myeloid leukemia


Chronic myelogenous leukemia


Acute lymphoblastic leukemia


Chronic lymphocytic leukemia


Acute leukemia


Permissible exposure limit


Parts per million


Time weighted average


International Commission on Radiological Protection


Electromagnetic fields


Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields


International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection


Two-stage clonal expansion






International Agency for Research on Cancer


Dichloro Diphenyl Trichloroethane




Polychlorinated Biphenyls


Standardized Incidence Ratio


Odds Ratio




Life-time Attributable Risk


Attributable fraction


Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia


United States Air Force




Colony Forming Unit-Granulocyte/Macrophage


Agricultural Health Study.


  1. 1.

    Bozzone DM: The biology of cancer: Leukemia. New York: Infobase Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boyle P, Levin B (Eds): World Cancer Report 2008. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mughal TI, Goldman JM, Mughal ST: Understanding Leukemias, Lymphomas and Myelomas. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council: Health Risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kato H, Schull WJ: Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. 7. Mortality, 1950–1978: Part I. Cancer mortality. Radiat Res 1982, 90: 395–432. 10.2307/3575716

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Little MP: Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. J Radiol Prot 2009, 29: A43-A59. 10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S04

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Cullings HM, Fujita S, Funamoto S, Kodama K: Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res 2004, 162: 377–389. 10.1667/RR3232

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Preston DL, Kusumi S, Tomonaga M, Izumi S, Ron E, Kuramoto A, Kamada N, Dohy H, Matsuo T, Matsui T: Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950–1987. Radiat Res 1994, 137: S68-S97. 10.2307/3578893

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Richardson D, Sugiyama H, Nishi N, Sakata R, Shimizu Y, Grant EJ, Soda M, Hsu WL, Suyama A, Kodama K, Kasagi F: Ionizing radiation and leukemia mortality among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors, 1950–2000. Radiat Res 2009, 172: 368–382. 10.1667/RR1801.1

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Noshchenko AG, Zamostyan PV, Bondar OY, Drozdova VD: Radiation-induced leukemia risk among those aged 0–20 at the time of the Chernobyl accident: a case-control study in the Ukraine. Int J Cancer 2002, 99: 609–618. 10.1002/ijc.10406

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Austin H, Delzell E, Cole P: Benzene and leukemia. A review of the literature and a risk assessment. Am J Epidemiol 1988, 127: 419–439.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pubchem Compound Database: Benzene - Compound Summary CID 241.

  13. 13.

    Moen BE, Steinsvag K, Braveit M: What do we know about chemical hazards in offshore work? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004, 124: 2627–2629.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hayes RB, Songnian Y, Dosemeci M, Linet M: Benzene and lymphohematopoietic malignancies in humans. Am J Ind Med 2001, 40: 117–126. 10.1002/ajim.1078

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rinsky RA, Smith AB, Hornung R, Filloon TG, Young RJ, Okun AH, Landrigan PJ: Benzene and leukemia. An epidemiologic risk assessment. N Engl J Med 1987, 316: 1044–1050. 10.1056/NEJM198704233161702

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Khalade A, Jaakkola MS, Pukkala E, Jaakkola JJ: Exposure to benzene at work and the risk of leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health 2010, 9: 31. 10.1186/1476-069X-9-31

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lamm SH, Engel A, Joshi KP, Byrd DM 3rd, Chen R: Chronic myelogenous leukemia and benzene exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the case-control literature. Chem Biol Interact 2009, 182: 93–97. 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.08.010

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rowley JD, Golomb HM, Vardiman J: Acute leukemia after treatment of lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1977, 297: 1013.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sekeres MA, Kalaycio ME, Bolwell BJ (Eds): Clinical Malignant Hematology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Connor TH, McDiarmid MA: Preventing occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings. CA Cancer J Clin 2006, 56: 354–365. 10.3322/canjclin.56.6.354

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mason HJ, Morton J, Garfitt SJ, Iqbal S, Jones K: Cytotoxic drug contamination on the outside of vials delivered to a hospital pharmacy. Ann Occup Hyg 2003, 47: 681–685. 10.1093/annhyg/meg078

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Preventing Occupational Exposures to Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Health Care Settings. Cincinnati: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2004.

  23. 23.

    Skov T, Maarup B, Olsen J, Rorth M, Winthereik H, Lynge E: Leukaemia and reproductive outcome among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs. Br J Ind Med 1992, 49: 855–861.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Skov T, Lynge E, Maarup B, Olsen J, Rorth M, Winthereik H: Risks for physicians handling antineoplastic drugs. Lancet 1990, 336: 1446.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ratner PA, Spinelli JJ, Beking K, Lorenzi M, Chow Y, Teschke K, Le ND, Gallagher RP, Dimich-Ward H: Cancer incidence and adverse pregnancy outcome in registered nurses potentially exposed to antineoplastic drugs. BMC Nurs 2010, 9: 15. 10.1186/1472-6955-9-15

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McDiarmid MA, Oliver MS, Roth TS, Rogers B, Escalante C: Chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities in oncology personnel handling anticancer drugs. J Occup Environ Med 2010, 52: 1028–1034. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f73ae6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rahu M, Rahu K, Auvinen A, Tekkel M, Stengrevics A, Hakulinen T, Boice JD Jr, Inskip PD: Cancer risk among Chernobyl cleanup workers in Estonia and Latvia, 1986–1998. Int J Cancer 2006, 119: 162–168. 10.1002/ijc.21733

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Abramenko I, Bilous N, Chumak A, Davidova E, Kryachok I, Martina Z, Nechaev S, Dyagil I, Bazyka D, Bebeshko V: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients exposed to ionizing radiation due to the Chernobyl NPP accident–with focus on immunoglobulin heavy chain gene analysis. Leuk Res 2008, 32: 535–545. 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.08.013

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Romanenko A, Bebeshko V, Hatch M, Bazyka D, Finch S, Dyagil I, Reiss R, Chumak V, Bouville A, Gudzenko N: The Ukrainian-American study of leukemia and related disorders among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine: I. Study methods. Radiat Res 2008, 170: 691–697. 10.1667/RR1402.1

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Romanenko AY, Finch SC, Hatch M, Lubin JH, Bebeshko VG, Bazyka DA, Gudzenko N, Dyagil IS, Reiss RF, Bouville A: The Ukrainian-American study of leukemia and related disorders among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine: III. Radiation risks. Radiat Res 2008, 170: 711–720. 10.1667/RR1404.1

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kesminiene A, Evrard AS, Ivanov VK, Malakhova IV, Kurtinaitis J, Stengrevics A, Tekkel M, Anspaugh LR, Bouville A, Chekin S: Risk of hematological malignancies among Chernobyl liquidators. Radiat Res 2008, 170: 721–735. 10.1667/RR1231.1

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Boice JD, Cohen SS, Mumma MT, Dupree Ellis E, Eckerman KF, Leggett RW, Boecker BB, Brill AB, Henderson BE: Mortality among radiation workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948–1999. Radiat Res 2006, 166: 98–115. 10.1667/RR3582.1

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Richardson DB, Wing S, Wolf S: Mortality among workers at the Savannah River Site. Am J Ind Med 2007, 50: 881–891. 10.1002/ajim.20511

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Richardson DB, Wing S: Leukemia mortality among workers at the Savannah River Site. Am J Epidemiol 2007, 166: 1015–1022. 10.1093/aje/kwm176

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schubauer-Berigan MK, Daniels RD, Fleming DA, Markey AM, Couch JR, Ahrenholz SH, Burphy JS, Anderson JL, Tseng CY: Risk of chronic myeloid and acute leukemia mortality after exposure to ionizing radiation among workers at four U.S. nuclear weapons facilities and a nuclear naval shipyard. Radiat Res 2007, 167: 222–232. 10.1667/RR0724.1

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schubauer-Berigan MK, Daniels RD, Fleming DA, Markey AM, Couch JR, Ahrenholz SH, Burphy JS, Anderson JL, Tseng CY: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and radiation: findings among workers at five US nuclear facilities and a review of the recent literature. Br J Haematol 2007, 139: 799–808. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06843.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Matanoski GM, Tonascia JA, Correa-Villasenor A, Yates KC, Fink N, Elliott E, Sanders B, Lantry D: Cancer risks and low-level radiation in U.S. shipyard workers. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2008, 49: 83–91. 10.1269/jrr.06082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ashmore JP, Gentner NE, Osborne RV: Incomplete data on the Canadian cohort may have affected the results of the study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer on the radiogenic cancer risk among nuclear industry workers in 15 countries. J Radiol Prot 2010, 30: 121–129. 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/001

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lie JA, Kjaerheim K, Tynes T: Ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risk among Norwegian nurses. Eur J Cancer Prev 2008, 17: 369–375. 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282b6fe0a

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Samerdokiene V, Atkocius V, Valuckas KP: The risk of cancer among Lithuanian medical radiation workers in 1978–2004. Medicina (Kaunas) 2009, 45: 412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ramos M, Montoro A, Almonacid M, Ferrer S, Barquinero JF, Tortosa R, Verdu G, Rodriguez P, Barrios L, Villaescusa JI: Radiation effects in interventional radiology using biological and physical dosimetry methods: a case-control study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008, 2008: 2809–2812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ramos M, Montoro A, Almonacid M, Ferrer S, Barquinero JF, Tortosa R, Verdu G, Rodriguez P, Barrios LL, Villaescusa JI: Radiation effects analysis in a group of interventional radiologists using biological and physical dosimetry methods. Eur J Radiol 2009, 75: 259–264.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ahn YS, Park RM, Koh DH: Cancer admission and mortality in workers exposed to ionizing radiation in Korea. J Occup Environ Med 2008, 50: 791–803. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318167751d

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Storm HH, Jorgensen HO, Kejs AM, Engholm G: Depleted uranium and cancer in Danish Balkan veterans deployed 1992–2001. Eur J Cancer 2006, 42: 2355–2358. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.064

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mohner M, Lindtner M, Otten H, Gille HG: Leukemia and exposure to ionizing radiation among German uranium miners. Am J Ind Med 2006, 49: 238–248. 10.1002/ajim.20289

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mohner M, Gellissen J, Marsh JW, Gregoratto D: Occupational and diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation and leukemia risk among German uranium miners. Health Phys 2010, 99: 314–321. 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181cd6536

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Roosli M, Lortscher M, Egger M, Pfluger D, Schreier N, Lortscher E, Locher P, Spoerri A, Minder C: Leukaemia, brain tumours and exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields: cohort study of Swiss railway employees. Occup Environ Med 2007, 64: 553–559. 10.1136/oem.2006.030270

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kheifets L, Monroe J, Vergara X, Mezei G, Afifi AA: Occupational electromagnetic fields and leukemia and brain cancer: an update to two meta-analyses. J Occup Environ Med 2008, 50: 677–688. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181757a27

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhang L, Rothman N, Li G, Guo W, Yang W, Hubbard AE, Hayes RB, Yin S, Lu W, Smith MT: Aberrations in chromosomes associated with lymphoma and therapy-related leukemia in benzene-exposed workers. Environ Mol Mutagen 2007, 48: 467–474. 10.1002/em.20306

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Richardson DB: Multistage modeling of leukemia in benzene workers: a simple approach to fitting the 2-stage clonal expansion model. Am J Epidemiol 2009, 169: 78–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rushton L, Brown TP, Cherrie J, Fortunato L, Van Tongeren M, Hutchings SJ: How much does benzene contribute to the overall burden of cancer due to occupation? Chem Biol Interact 2009, 184: 290–292.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Costantini AS, Benvenuti A, Vineis P, Kriebel D, Tumino R, Ramazzotti V, Rodella S, Stagnaro E, Crosignani P, Amadori D: Risk of leukemia and multiple myeloma associated with exposure to benzene and other organic solvents: evidence from the Italian Multicenter Case-control study. Am J Ind Med 2008, 51: 803–811. 10.1002/ajim.20592

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cocco P, t'Mannetje A, Fadda D, Melis M, Becker N, de Sanjose S, Foretova L, Mareckova J, Staines A, Kleefeld S: Occupational exposure to solvents and risk of lymphoma subtypes: results from the Epilymph case-control study. Occup Environ Med 2010, 67: 341–347. 10.1136/oem.2009.046839

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lehman EJ, Hein MJ: Mortality of workers employed in shoe manufacturing: an update. Am J Ind Med 2006, 49: 535–546. 10.1002/ajim.20322

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Atallah E, Schiffer CA: Agent Orange, prostate cancer irradiation and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): is there a link? Leuk Res 2007, 31: 720–721. 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.06.025

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Collins JJ, Bodner K, Aylward LL, Wilken M, Bodnar CM: Mortality rates among trichlorophenol workers with exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Am J Epidemiol 2009, 170: 501–506. 10.1093/aje/kwp153

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Delzell E, Sathiakumar N, Graff J, Macaluso M, Maldonado G, Matthews R: An updated study of mortality among North American synthetic rubber industry workers. Res Rep Health Eff Inst 2006, (132):1–63. discussion 65–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Beall C, Corn M, Cheng H, Matthews R, Delzell E: Mortality and cancer incidence among tire manufacturing workers hired in or after 1962. J Occup Environ Med 2007, 49: 680–690. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318074bb30

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Cheng H, Sathiakumar N, Graff J, Matthews R, Delzell E: 1,3-Butadiene and leukemia among synthetic rubber industry workers: exposure-response relationships. Chem Biol Interact 2007, 166: 15–24. 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.10.004

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sathiakumar N, Delzell E: A follow-up study of women in the synthetic rubber industry: study methods. Chem Biol Interact 2007, 166: 25–28. 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.11.005

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sathiakumar N, Delzell E: A follow-up study of mortality among women in the North American synthetic rubber industry. J Occup Environ Med 2009, 51: 1314–1325. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181bd8972

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Beane Freeman LE, Blair A, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Hoover RN, Hauptmann M: Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries: the National Cancer Institute Cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009, 101: 751–761. 10.1093/jnci/djp096

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hauptmann M, Stewart PA, Lubin JH, Beane Freeman LE, Hornung RW, Herrick RF, Hoover RN, Fraumeni JF Jr, Blair A, Hayes RB: Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies and brain cancer among embalmers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009, 101: 1696–1708. 10.1093/jnci/djp416

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhang L, Tang X, Rothman N, Vermeulen R, Ji Z, Shen M, Qiu C, Guo W, Liu S, Reiss B: Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity, and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19: 80–88. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0762

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Speit G, Gelbke HP, Pallapies D, Morfeld P: Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19: 1882–1884. author reply 1884–1885 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0155

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lam TV, Agovino P, Niu X, Roche L: Linkage study of cancer risk among lead-exposed workers in New Jersey. Sci Total Environ 2007, 372: 455–462. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.10.018

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Mahajan R, Blair A, Lynch CF, Schroeder P, Hoppin JA, Sandler DP, Alavanja MC: Fonofos exposure and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114: 1838–1842.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mahajan R, Bonner MR, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MC: Phorate exposure and incidence of cancer in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114: 1205–1209. 10.1289/ehp.8911

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Miligi L, Costantini AS, Veraldi A, Benvenuti A, Vineis P: Cancer and pesticides: an overview and some results of the Italian multicenter case-control study on hematolymphopoietic malignancies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1076: 366–377. 10.1196/annals.1371.036

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Hansen ES, Lander F, Lauritsen JM: Time trends in cancer risk and pesticide exposure, a long-term follow-up of Danish gardeners. Scand J Work Environ Health 2007, 33: 465–469. 10.5271/sjweh.1162

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Purdue MP, Hoppin JA, Blair A, Dosemeci M, Alavanja MC: Occupational exposure to organochlorine insecticides and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study. Int J Cancer 2007, 120: 642–649. 10.1002/ijc.22258

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    van Bemmel DM, Visvanathan K, Beane Freeman LE, Coble J, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MC: S-ethyl-N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate exposure and cancer incidence among male pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study: a prospective cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116: 1541–1546. 10.1289/ehp.11371

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Chrisman Jde R, Koifman S, de Novaes Sarcinelli P, Moreira JC, Koifman RJ, Meyer A: Pesticide sales and adult male cancer mortality in Brazil. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009, 212: 310–321. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.07.006

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Delancey JO, Alavanja MC, Coble J, Blair A, Hoppin JA, Austin HD, Beane Freeman LE: Occupational exposure to metribuzin and the incidence of cancer in the Agricultural Health Study. Ann Epidemiol 2009, 19: 388–395. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.12.018

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Orsi L, Delabre L, Monnereau A, Delval P, Berthou C, Fenaux P, Marit G, Soubeyran P, Huguet F, Milpied N: Occupational exposure to pesticides and lymphoid neoplasms among men: results of a French case-control study. Occup Environ Med 2009, 66: 291–298. 10.1136/oem.2008.040972

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Rusiecki JA, Patel R, Koutros S, Beane-Freeman L, Landgren O, Bonner MR, Coble J, Lubin J, Blair A, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MC: Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to permethrin in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 2009, 117: 581–586.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Bassil KL, Vakil C, Sanborn M, Cole DC, Kaur JS, Kerr KJ: Cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review. Can Fam Physician 2007, 53: 1704–1711.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Moore T, Brennan P, Becker N, de Sanjose S, Maynadie M, Foretova L, Cocco P, Staines A, Nieters A, Font R: Occupational exposure to meat and risk of lymphoma: a multicenter case-control study from Europe. Int J Cancer 2007, 121: 2761–2766. 10.1002/ijc.22994

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Johnson ES, Ndetan H, Lo KM: Cancer mortality in poultry slaughtering/processing plant workers belonging to a union pension fund. Environ Res 2010, 110: 588–594. 10.1016/j.envres.2010.05.010

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Johnson ES, Zhou Y, Lillian Yau C, Prabhakar D, Ndetan H, Singh K, Preacely N: Mortality from malignant diseases-update of the Baltimore union poultry cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2010, 21: 215–221. 10.1007/s10552-009-9452-6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Dimich-Ward H, Lorenzi M, Teschke K, Spinelli JJ, Ratner PA, Le ND, Chow Y, Shu D, Gallagher RP: Mortality and cancer incidence in a cohort of registered nurses from British Columbia, Canada. Am J Ind Med 2007, 50: 892–900. 10.1002/ajim.20505

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Abel GA, Bertrand KA, Earle CC, Laden F: Outcomes for lymphoid malignancies in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) as compared to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Hematol Oncol 2009, 28: 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lollis SS, Valdes PA, Li Z, Ball PA, Roberts DW: Cause-specific mortality among neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg 2010, 113: 474–478. 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091740

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kubale T, Hiratzka S, Henn S, Markey A, Daniels R, Utterback D, Waters K, Silver S, Robinson C, Macievic G, Lodwick J: A cohort mortality study of chemical laboratory workers at Department of Energy Nuclear Plants. Am J Ind Med 2008, 51: 656–667. 10.1002/ajim.20601

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Bates MN: Registry-based case-control study of cancer in California firefighters. Am J Ind Med 2007, 50: 339–344. 10.1002/ajim.20446

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Huebner WW, Wojcik NC, Jorgensen G, Marcella SP, Nicolich MJ: Mortality patterns and trends among 127,266 U.S.-based men in a petroleum company: update 1979–2000. J Occup Environ Med 2009, 51: 1333–1348. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181be6c18

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Gazdek D, Strnad M, Mustajbegovic J, Nemet-Lojan Z: Lymphohematopoietic malignancies and oil exploitation in Koprivnica-Krizevci County, Croatia. Int J Occup Environ Health 2007, 13: 258–267.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Iaia TE, Bartoli D, Calzoni P, Comba P, De Santis M, Dini F, Farina GA, Valiani M, Pirastu R: A cohort mortality study of leather tanners in Tuscany, Italy. Am J Ind Med 2006, 49: 452–459. 10.1002/ajim.20309

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Firth H, Gray A, Carpenter LM, Cox B: Cancer mortality by occupation among New Zealand women: 1988–1997. N Z Med J 2007, 120: U2833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Hoffmann W, Terschueren C, Heimpel H, Feller A, Butte W, Hostrup O, Richardson D, Greiser E: Population-based research on occupational and environmental factors for leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the Northern Germany Leukemia and Lymphoma Study (NLL). Am J Ind Med 2008, 51: 246–257. 10.1002/ajim.20551

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Richardson DB, Terschuren C, Hoffmann W: Occupational risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a population-based case-control study in Northern Germany. Am J Ind Med 2008, 51: 258–268. 10.1002/ajim.20552

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Kaufman DW, Anderson TE, Issaragrisil S: Risk factors for leukemia in Thailand. Ann Hematol 2009, 88: 1079–1088. 10.1007/s00277-009-0731-9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    McLean D, Mannetje A, Dryson E, Walls C, McKenzie F, Maule M, Cheng S, Cunningham C, Kromhout H, Boffetta P: Leukaemia and occupation: a New Zealand Cancer Registry-based case-control Study. Int J Epidemiol 2009, 38: 594–606.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Pearce MS, Hammal DM, Dorak MT, McNally RJ, Parker L: Paternal occupational exposure to pesticides or herbicides as risk factors for cancer in children and young adults: a case-control study from the North of England. Arch Environ Occup Health 2006, 61: 138–144. 10.3200/AEOH.61.3.138-144

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Pearce MS, Hammal DM, Dorak MT, McNally RJ, Parker L: Paternal occupational exposure to electro-magnetic fields as a risk factor for cancer in children and young adults: a case-control study from the North of England. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007, 49: 280–286. 10.1002/pbc.21021

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    McKinney PA, Raji OY, van Tongeren M, Feltbower RG: The UK Childhood Cancer Study: maternal occupational exposures and childhood leukaemia and lymphoma. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008, 132: 232–240. 10.1093/rpd/ncn265

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Perez-Saldivar ML, Ortega-Alvarez MC, Fajardo-Gutierrez A, Bernaldez-Rios R, Del Campo-Martinez Mde L, Medina-Sanson A, Palomo-Colli MA, Paredes-Aguilera R, Martinez-Avalos A, Borja-Aburto VH: Father's occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents and childhood acute leukemia: a new method to assess exposure (a case-control study). BMC Cancer 2008, 8: 7. 10.1186/1471-2407-8-7

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Telle-Lamberton M, Samson E, Caer S, Bergot D, Bard D, Bermann F, Gelas JM, Giraud JM, Hubert P, Metz-Flamant C: External radiation exposure and mortality in a cohort of French nuclear workers. Occup Environ Med 2007, 64: 694–700. 10.1136/oem.2007.032631

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Gilbert ES: Invited commentary: studies of workers exposed to low doses of radiation. Am J Epidemiol 2001, 153: 319–322. discussion 323–314 10.1093/aje/153.4.319

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Howe GR: Leukemia following the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys 2007, 93: 512–515. 10.1097/01.HP.0000281178.75068.e3

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Lagorio S, Grande E, Martina L: Review of epidemiological studies of cancer risk among Gulf War and Balkans veterans. Epidemiol Prev 2008, 32: 145–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Macfarlane GJ, Biggs AM, Maconochie N, Hotopf M, Doyle P, Lunt M: Incidence of cancer among UK Gulf war veterans: cohort study. BMJ 2003, 327: 1373. 10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1373

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Kim EA, Lee WJ, Son M, Kang SK: Occupational lymphohematopoietic cancer in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2010, 25: S99-S104. 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.S.S99

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Formaldehyde Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc 2010, i-512.

  105. 105.

    Kupczewska-Dobecka M: Assessment of carcinogenicity of formaldehyde based on the newest literature data. Med Pr 2007, 58: 527–539.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Collins JJ, Lineker GA: A review and meta-analysis of formaldehyde exposure and leukemia. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2004, 40: 81–91. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.04.006

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Golden R, Pyatt D, Shields PG: Formaldehyde as a potential human leukemogen: an assessment of biological plausibility. Crit Rev Toxicol 2006, 36: 135–153. 10.1080/10408440500533208

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Zhang L, Steinmaus C, Eastmond DA, Xin XK, Smith MT: Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia: a new meta-analysis and potential mechanisms. Mutat Res 2009, 681: 150–168. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.07.002

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Schwilk E, Zhang L, Smith MT, Smith AH, Steinmaus C: Formaldehyde and leukemia: an updated meta-analysis and evaluation of bias. J Occup Environ Med 2010, 52: 878–886. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181ef7e31

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Cole P, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D, Mandel JS: Re: Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies and brain cancer among embalmers exposed to formaldehyde. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102: 1518–1519. author reply 1519–1520 10.1093/jnci/djq332

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Goldstein BD: Hematological and toxicological evaluation of formaldehyde as a potential cause of human leukemia. Hum Exp Toxicol 2011, 30: 725–735. 10.1177/0960327110381682

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Svec MA, Ward MH, Dosemeci M, Checkoway H, De Roos AJ: Risk of lymphatic or haematopoietic cancer mortality with occupational exposure to animals or the public. Occup Environ Med 2005, 62: 726–735. 10.1136/oem.2005.021550

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Fritschi L, Johnson KC, Kliewer EV, Fry R: Animal-related occupations and the risk of leukemia, myeloma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Canada. Cancer Causes Control 2002, 13: 563–571. 10.1023/A:1016331128897

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    McLean D, Pearce N: Cancer among meat industry workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, 30: 425–437. 10.5271/sjweh.831

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Wong O, Harris F, Armstrong TW, Hua F: A hospital-based case-control study of acute myeloid leukemia in Shanghai: analysis of environmental and occupational risk factors by subtypes of the WHO classification. Chem Biol Interact 2010, 184: 112–128. 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.10.017

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Polychronakis.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

IP, GD, VM, ER, and AL have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the review, acquisition of the review data and have been involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polychronakis, I., Dounias, G., Makropoulos, V. et al. Work-related leukemia: a systematic review. J Occup Med Toxicol 8, 14 (2013).

Download citation


  • Leukemia
  • Exposure
  • Occupation
  • Worker
  • Work-related
  • Hazard
  • Risk-factor