Open Access

Professional exposure to basaltic rock dust: assessment by the Vibrio fischeri ecotoxicological test

  • Caterina Ledda1Email author,
  • Venerando Rapisarda2,
  • Massimo Bracci3,
  • Lidia Proietti2,
  • Matteo Zuccarello1,
  • Roberto Fallico1,
  • Maria Fiore1 and
  • Margherita Ferrante1
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology20138:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-8-23

Received: 7 February 2013

Accepted: 27 August 2013

Published: 2 September 2013

Abstract

Background

A recent study demonstrates that inhalation of airborne particulate from Mount Etna eruptions may induce fibrotic lung disease. The occupational exposure of construction workers from the Etna area, who excavate building sites and use basalt dust to make mortar, has never been assessed.

Methods

Samples of basalt, volcanic ash, basalt + cement and cement dust were collected on the construction site of a subway tunnel, ground to dust and subjected to the Microtox® solid-phase test to evaluate the toxicity of dust suspensions. Samples were investigated by scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). Minerals were identified and characterized by their morphology and elemental composition.

Results

The elements found most frequently were C, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe and O. All four dusts were toxic: basalt and ash were significantly less toxic than basalt + cement and cement, which shared a similar and very high degree of toxicity. Higher Fe, Ca and Mg concentrations were associated with greater toxicity.

Conclusions

The risk related to long-term occupational exposure to various dusts on constructions sites in the Mount Etna area should be further assessed.

Keywords

Vibrio fischeri Microtox® Basaltic stone Ecotoxicological test Ash Mount Etna

Background

Studies of ash exposure related to volcanic activity among the residents of the Etna area (Sicily, Italy) have shown an increase in the rate of acute respiratory and cardiovascular diseases[1, 2] and accumulation of heavy metals in the airways[3]. In a recent study Censi and co-workers[4] demonstrated that inhalation of airborne particulate from Mount Etna eruptions may be responsible for fibrotic lung disease. The possible health effects experienced by construction workers excavating basaltic rock, which forms from volcanic eruptions, have never been investigated.

Considerable effort has been devoted to studying the physical structure[5, 6] and chemical composition of volcanic ash[7]. Chemical analysis assists in determining elemental concentration and provides estimates of ash distribution[8, 9]. However, chemical data alone do not provide information on all its potential effects on the environment.

Some worker categories, especially those employed in the construction industry, are exposed to basaltic rock dust, volcanic dust and cement. Furthermore cement and basalt dust are often mixed to make mortar.

Cement dust inhalation is associated with an increased prevalence of chronic respiratory symptoms and a reduction of ventilatory capacity[10, 11]. In a number of risk assessment studies[1217] toxicity tests are associated with chemical data in the framework of tiered decision-making, since bioassays provide ecologically relevant information and are rapid and cost-effective screening tools; such tests are however time-consuming and some test organisms require further culture.

The advantages of various test organisms were compared by Hsu et al.[18], who noted that bioassays based on bacteria (such as Microtox®) involve a simple procedure, short testing times and are cost-effective. For instance analysis using Vibrio fischeri, available in many countries and recommended by international standards (Standard Methods, 1995, ISO/DIS 11348, DIN 38412), is a rapid and economical assay to monitor the toxicity of environmental contaminants, and has been applied to investigate metal plating wastewater[19] and air pollutants[20]. However, limited data are available on the biotoxicity of dust, especially ash and basaltic rocks[2123].

The aim of this study was to assess the ecotoxicological effects of suspensions of basaltic rock, ash and cement dusts, which are typically found on construction sites in the Etna area, on the natural bioluminescence of the marine bacterium V. fischeri (Microtox®, AZUR Environmental).

Methods

Sampling

Basalt residues (A), volcanic ash (B), mixed basalt and cement (C) and cement (D) were collected on the construction site of a subway tunnel in Catania, Sicily. Basalt is representative of the volcanic and volcaniclastic lithologies of the area; to make the sample more representative the actual dust produced by the excavation work was collected (C and D).

Samples were collected and transported to the laboratory in polyethylene bags. They were dried in an oven at 40°C and stored in polyethylene containers.

Sample characterization

Dust samples were prepared with gold coating under vacuum, to improve image quality and examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Cambridge Stereoscan 360) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) system (Oxford Instruments INCA Energy) for semi-quantitative chemical analysis (minimum spot size, 5 μm; working distance, 10 mm; accelerating voltage, 20 kV). Samples were examined at different magnifications for their morphological features and analyzed by EDX to establish their chemical composition. Spectra of 10 points were acquired for each sample.

Vibrio fischeri ecotoxicological test

Two grams of each dust type were extracted with 50 ml Diluent Solution (AZUR Environmental), a specially prepared non-toxic 2% sodium chloride solution. We used a Microtox Model 500 analyzer (SDIx, USA) and carefully performed all the procedures described in the Microtox® standard protocol[24]. Freeze-dried luminescent V. fischeri bacteria (NRRL B-11177) were reconstituted and exposed in duplicate to four diluted extracts osmotically adjusted with Microtox osmotic adjusting solution (a specially prepared non-toxic 22% sodium chloride solution). The decrease in bioluminescence induced by exposure to the dusts was measured at 5 and 15 min at a constant temperature of 15°C. Only the 15 min data are reported in this study. All Microtox® data were recorded and analyzed by the online software. Results are expressed as effective concentration 50% (EC50) in the 2 g samples. The toxic effect of each sample was assessed as toxicity units (TU), which were calculated as follows:
TU = 1 / EC 50 × 100 %

TU represents relative toxicity as described by Kahru et al.[25]: <1% = non toxic; 1–40% = toxic; 40–100% = very toxic; >100% = extremely toxic.

To check the reliability of the Microtox® method and reagents, a toxicity test was carried out each day using a phenol aqueous solution (100 mg/L) prior to beginning sample testing. Its results were compared with the Microtox® quality assurance product data. Procedural blanks were also tested to determine whether any toxicity was being contributed by the residual extracts and glassware. No toxicity was detected in the blanks.

Data analysis

The EDX data were analyzed and standard deviation (SD) was calculated to identify the compounds that were most frequently found in the dust samples.

Student’s t test with Bonferroni’s correction was applied with SPSS 20.0 to compare the changes in TU based on the concentrations of the elements found most frequently in the four samples.

Results and discussions

The results of EDX analysis are reported in Table 1 as the mean of 10 spectra per dust type. The per cent weight of the elements detected more frequently in each sample is shown in Figure 1. These elements were: C, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe and O.
Figure 1

Concentrations of the elements found more frequently in the four samples (% weight). Elements are distinguished by color as specified in the figure.

Table 1

EDX analysis (% weight)

 

C

Na

Mg

Al

Si

S

Cl

K

Ca

Ti

Mn

Fe

W

O

P

Nb

Br

Sample A

8.79

5.98

2.36

14.2

27.79

0.00

0.59

7.80

11.72

0.52

0.60

16.64

2.48

51.42

1.81

0.99

0.00

Sample B

9.11

4.86

4.61

11.25

23.54

0.00

0.24

4.58

12.99

0.70

0.00

14.36

2.53

43.26

0.00

0.00

2.11

Sample C

0.00

7.51

5.05

14.72

30.82

0.00

0.58

10.20

36.70

1.64

0.00

33.02

3.24

46.71

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sample D

24.04

5.78

7.52

9.88

23.80

0.83

0.99

3.79

32.66

5.01

0.61

24.71

1.97

68.33

0.00

0.00

0.00

P value

P < 0.05

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

p < 0.05

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

p < 0.05

n.s.

n.s.

p < 0.05

n.s.

p < 0.05

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s. not significant.

The t test for paired data with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons showed significant differences for C, Ca, Fe, O, Si and Mg (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

The Microtox® test results indicated that all dust samples induced acute toxic effects on V. fischeri (Table 2). The toxicity measured in the samples of basalt stone dust (A) and volcanic ash (B) was significantly lower than that of the mixed material (C) and of cement (D), which shared a similar high degree of toxicity (close to 100%).
Table 2

Microtox ® test results: toxicity of the four dust samples

 

TU (%)

Sample A

19.31

Sample B

31.22

Sample C

99.05

Sample D

98.95

Figure 2 demonstrates that rising Ca, Fe and Mg content was associated with increased toxicity, whereas this did not occur with O, C, and Si.
Figure 2

Profiles of the elements for which student’s t test with Bonferroni’s correction provided significant differences and toxic effect (0-100%) of the dust suspensions in relation to their per cent content in the elements found more frequently. Elements and % effect are distinguished by color as specified in the figure.

The present findings document the toxic nature of all the dusts studied. Among these, cement appears to be more toxic than basalt dust and volcanic ash. Combining cement with basalt dust does not alter its toxicity.

Conclusion

The ecotoxicological approach, suggested by Coutand et al.[26], is a new method to assess the occupational risk associated with exposure to dust and ash.

The toxicity of our volcanic ash and basalt dust samples was considerably lower than that of cement and of cement mixed with basalt dust.

Application of the Microtox® ecotoxicological test documented the reactivity of the dusts to which construction workers employed on building sites in the Etna area are consistently exposed. The risk related to their long-term exposure should be further assessed. Our study protocol provides an exhaustive characterization of the potential of the dust to become a respiratory hazard. Health impact studies are essential to make officials and the public aware of the potential health impacts of volcanic emissions and of how public health resources should be allocated.

Authors’ information

CL- Bachelor of Science, Medical laboratory scientist; VR- MD, PhD, Occupational Physician; MB- MD, PhD, Occupational Physician; LP- MD, Assistant Professor of Occupational Medicine; MZ- Chemical technician; RF-MD, Professor of Hygiene; MFi- MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Hygiene; MFe- MD, Professor of Hygiene.

Abbreviations

EC50: 

Effective concentration

EDX: 

Energy dispersive X-Ray

SEM: 

Scanning electron microscope

TU: 

Toxicity unit.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department “G.F. Ingrassia”– Hygiene and Public Health, University of Catania
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine and Systemic Diseases – Occupational Medicine, University of Catania
(3)
Occupational Medicine, Department of Molecular Pathology and Innovative Therapies, Polytechnic University of Marche

References

  1. Hansell AL, Horwell CJ, Oppenheimer C: The health hazards of volcanoes and geothermal areas. Occup Environ Med 2006, 63: 149–156. 10.1136/oem.2005.022459PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fano V, Cernigliaro A, Scondotto S, Cuccia M, Forastiere F, Nicolosi A, Oliveri C, Scillieri R, Distefano P, Perucci CA: Health effects of environmental contamination due to volcanic ash of Mount Etna in autumn 2002. Epidemiologia e prevenzione 2005, 29: 180–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Censi P, Zuddas P, Randazzo LA, Tamburo E, Speziale S, Cuttitta A, Punturo R, Aricò P, Santagata R: Source and nature of inhaled atmospheric dust from trace element analyses of human bronchial fluids. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45: 6262–6267. 10.1021/es200539pView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Censi P, Tamburo E, Speziale S, Zuddas P, Randazzo LA, Punturo R, Cuttitta A, Aricò P: Yttrium and lanthanides in human lung fluids, probing the exposure to atmospheric fallout. J Hazard Mater 2011, 186: 1103–1110. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.113View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ontiveros JL, Clapp TL, Kosson DS: Physical properties and chemical species distributions within municipal waste combuster ashes. Environ Prog 1989, 8: 200–206. 10.1002/ep.3300080319View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Álvarez-Ayuso E, Querol X, Plana F, Alastuey A, Moreno N, Izquierdo M, Font O, Moreno T, Diez S, Vázquez E, et al.: Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. J Hazard Mater 2008, 154: 175–183. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Criado MR, Pereiro IR, Torrijos RC: Determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in ash using dimethylsulfoxide microwave assisted extraction followed by solid-phase microextraction. Talanta 2004, 63: 533–540. 10.1016/j.talanta.2003.11.039View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiu JC, Shen YH, Li HW, Lin LF, Wang LC, Chang-Chien GP: Emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans from an electric arc furnace, secondary aluminum smelter, crematory and joss paper incinerators. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2011, 11: 13–20.Google Scholar
  9. Huang CJ, Chen KS, Lai YC, Wang LC, Chang-Chien GP: Wet deposition of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofuran in a rural area of Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2011, 11: 732–748.Google Scholar
  10. Alvear-Galindo MG, Mendez-Ramirez I, Villegas-Rodriguez JA, Chapela-Mendoza R, Eslava-Campos CA, Laurell AC: Risk indicator of dust exposure and health effects in cement plant workers. J Occup Environ Med 1999, 41: 654–661. 10.1097/00043764-199908000-00007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Abu Dhaise BA, Rabi AZ, Al Zwairy MA, El Hader AF, El Qaderi S: Pulmonary manifestations in cement workers in Jordan. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 1997, 10: 417–428.Google Scholar
  12. Perrodin Y, Babut M, Bedell JP, Bray M, Clement B, Delolme C, Devaux A, Durrieu C, Garric J, Montuelle B: Assessment of ecotoxicological risks related to depositing dredged materials from canals in northern France on soil. Environ Int 2006, 32: 804–814. 10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Apitz S, Carlon C, Oen A, White S: Strategic framework for managing sediment risk at the basin and site-specific scale. Sustainable Manage Sediment Resour 2007, 3: 77–106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Macken A, Giltrap M, Foley B, McGovern E, McHugh B, Davoren M: An integrated approach to the toxicity assessment of Irish marine sediments: validation of established marine bioassays for the monitoring of Irish marine sediments. Environ Int 2008, 34: 1023–1032. 10.1016/j.envint.2008.03.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Caeiro S, Costa MH, Delvalls A, Repolho T, Gonçalves M, Mosca A, Coimbra AP, Ramos TB, Painho M: Ecological risk assessment of sediment management areas: application to Sado Estuary, Portugal. Ecotoxicology 2009, 18: 1165–1175. 10.1007/s10646-009-0372-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Choueri RB, Cesar A, Abessa DMS, Torres RJ, Riba I, Pereira CDS, Nascimento MRL, Morais RD, Mozeto AA, Delvalls TA: Harmonised framework for ecological risk assessment of sediments from ports and estuarine zones of North and South Atlantic. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19: 678–696. 10.1007/s10646-009-0442-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mamindy-Pajany Y, Geret F, Roméo M, Hurel C, Marmier N: Ex situ remediation of contaminated sediments using mineral additives: assessment of pollutant bioavailability with the Microtox solid phase test. Chemosphere 2012, 86: 1112–1116. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsu KE, Ju CP, Chung YR: The review of biotoxicity test for effluent. Sinotech 2009, 104: 23–29.Google Scholar
  19. Choi K, Meier PG: Toxicity evaluatión of metal plating wastewater employing the Microtox® assay: a comparison with cladocerans and fish. Environ Toxicol 2001, 16: 136–141. 10.1002/tox.1017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin TC, Chao MR: Assessing the influence of methanol-containing additive on biological characteristics of diesel exhaust emissions using microtox and mutatox assays. Sci Total Environ 2002, 284: 61–74. 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00866-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chakraborty R, Mukherjee A: Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of coal fly ash water leachate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2009, 72: 838–842. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.09.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang SC, Wang YF, You SJ, Kuo YM, Tsai CH, Wang LC, Hsu PY: Toxicity evaluation of fly ash by Microtox®. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2013, 13: 1002–1008.Google Scholar
  23. Jd C, Wey MY, Liang HH, Chang SH: Biotoxicity evaluation of fly ash and bottom ash from different municipal solid waste incinerators. J Hazard Mater 2009, 168: 197–202. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Environmental A: Microtox Acute Toxicity Test Guide. Carlsbad, USA: Users Manual; 1998.Google Scholar
  25. Kahru A, Põllumaa L, Reiman R, Rätsep A: Microbiotests for the evaluation of the pollution from the oil shale industry. In New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Testing and Biomonitoring. Edited by: Persoone G, Janssen C, De Coen W. US: Springer; 2000:357–365.Google Scholar
  26. Coutand M, Cyr M, Clastres P: Quantification of uncertainty of experimental measurement in leaching test on cement-based materials. J Environ Manage 2011, 92(10):2494–2503. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ledda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.