Skip to main content

Association between occupational noise and vibration and anxiety in the South Korean working population: a cross-sectional study



Although occupational exposure to noise and vibration is common, its effect on psychological wellbeing is poorly understood. This study investigated the relationship between occupational exposure to noise and vibration and anxiety among Korean workers.


Data from the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey, conducted in 2017, were used. Participants were classified into four groups according to their level of exposure, and anxiety was assessed using a self-report questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the significance of the association between exposure and anxiety.


Overall, 45,241 participants were enrolled in this study. The likelihood of anxiety increased, in both males and females, when exposed to both occupational noise and vibration (males: odds ratio (OR) = 2.25, confidence interval [CI] = 1.77–2.87; females: OR = 2.17, CI = 1.79–2.61). The association between the varying degrees of noise, vibration, and combined exposure showed a dose–response relationship among males.


This study revealed that occupational noise and vibration exposure is associated with anxiety. These results suggest that more detailed regulations regarding occupational noise and vibration should be developed and implemented to ensure a safer environment for workers.


Anxiety is an emotion characterized by tension, worry, and physical symptoms including increased blood pressure, rapid heartbeat, and dizziness, among others [1]. According to the World Health Organization, the estimated prevalence of anxiety disorders is 3.6%, with a higher global prevalence in females (4.6%) than males (2.6%). It is estimated that 264 million people live with anxiety disorders worldwide, with a 14.9% rise in cases from 2005 to 2015 [2]. In South Korea, a 2016 survey conducted by the Ministry of Health and Welfare found that the incidence rate of an anxiety disorder was 3.8% in males and 7.5% in females [3].

High levels of occupational noise are a problem worldwide. For instance over 30 million workers in the United States of America are exposed to hazardous noise [4], whereas in South Korea, it is estimated that 2 million workers are exposed to hazardous noise [5]. Historically, occupational vibration has been overlooked. It took almost 78 years for vibration-induced injuries to be recognized as credible and deserving of compensation in the United Kingdom [6]. Many health issues and disorders are associated with exposure to vibrations, including circulatory, bone and joint, and muscle issues; neurological disorders; and disorders involving the central nervous systems [7].

Exposure to both noise and vibration can have major negative consequences. However, there is a lacuna in knowledge relating to the synergistic effect of combined noise and vibration exposure on anxiety. Further, investigation relating to occupational noise and vibration exposure can be challenging, owing to the numerous sources of extra-occupational noise and vibration [8].

Previous studies in South Korea have evaluated the relationship between noise exposure and headaches and eye strain [9]. However, the association between anxiety and exposure to noise and vibration has not been evaluated. A better understanding of this association could help in developing effective methods to prevent and manage the anxiety of workers. Thus, we investigated the association between exposure to noise and vibration and anxiety. Further, unlike previous studies that focused on the correlation between anxiety and exposure to noise and vibration individually, this study aimed to provide information about the combined effect of exposure to occupational noise and vibration.



The data were collected from the database of the 2017 Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), which was led by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. The KWCS has benchmarked the European Working Condition Survey research contents and methods and has been modified to account for cultural differences in criteria such as employment type, business type, or occupation [10]. The KWCS is used as a study to improve the working conditions in Korea, which includes categories such as quality of labor, health problems, and hazards exposure [11]. The survey included employed individuals aged 15 years and above. Face-to-face interviews were conducted through house visits across the country, using multistage systematic cluster sampling [12].


Data were gathered from 50,205 individuals. However, after excluding those who were unable to provide information, 45,241 individuals were included in this study. Our study did not require ethical approval because the KWCS is a secondary dataset that is available in the public domain and does not contain private information.


The dependent variable was anxiety. The KWCS asked each individual “Have you had any health problems with anxiety over the past 12 months?”, and participants were able to respond with either “Yes” or “No.”

The variables of interest were noise and vibration exposure. These were assessed using the following questions: (1) “In your workplace, are you exposed to noise so loud that you have to raise your voice to keep a conversation during work?” and (2) “How much are you exposed to hand-transmitted vibration or vibration generated by machinery?” Participants could choose one of seven responses to each question (i.e., never, almost never, one-quarter of the time, half of the time, three-quarters of the time, almost all the time, or all of the time). These were then reclassified with “never” as no exposure, and the rest of the responses were reclassified into noise exposure, vibration exposure, and noise and vibration exposure. In the subgroup analysis of our variables of interest, the degree of noise and vibration was each classified using a three-tier system. Those who answered “none” were classified as “no exposure to noise and/or vibration. The responses “almost never,” “one-quarter of the time,” “half of the time,” and “three-quarters of the time” were classified as “mild.” “Severe” included responses of “almost all the time” and “all of the time.” Noise plus vibration exposure was the combined total of the noise and vibration exposure degree and was grouped into two categories, that is, “mild” and “severe.”

The covariates included sex, age group, educational level, monthly income level, job collar, self-diagnosed presence of fatigue, hearing problems, headache/eyestrain symptoms, insomnia (the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria were used for diagnoses), use or non-usage of personal protective equipment, work duration, and number of working hours per week.

Statistical analysis

A descriptive analysis was performed to examine the distribution of the general characteristics of the study population. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between occupational noise, vibration, and anxiety after accounting for potential confounding variables, including demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics. The results were reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data were analyzed and then stratified by sex using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.; Cary, North Carolina).


The results of the univariate analyses, which examined the association between occupational exposure to noise and/or vibration and anxiety with each variable stratified by sex, are presented in Table 1. Among the 45,241 participants, 21,612 were male, and 23,629 were female. The overall incidence rate of anxiety was higher when exposed to both noise and vibration (3.6% in males and 4.4% in females).

Table 1 General characteristics of Study Subjects

The results of the logistic regression analysis examining the association between occupational exposure to noise and vibration and anxiety, for all variables stratified by sex, is presented in Table 2. Regardless of sex, participants exposed to only noise (female: OR = 1.50, CI = 1.12–2.01; male: OR = 1.55, CI = 1.06–2.27), and to both noise and vibration (female: OR = 2.17, CI = 1.79–2.61; male: OR = 2.25, CI = 1.77–2.87), showed increased odds of developing anxiety.

Table 2 Associations between Anxiety and Subject Demographics

Table 3 reports the findings of the subgroup analysis stratified by the independent variables. Male participants in the low-income group who were exposed to both noise and vibration showed higher odds of anxiety (OR:2.57 CI:1.49–3.21). Females in the pink-collar group and exposed to both noise and vibration showed higher odds of anxiety (OR = 2.56, CI = 1.95–3.35).

Table 3 Subgroup Analysis Stratified by Independent Variables

Table 4 shows the results of a subgroup analysis indicating the degree of exposure to noise or vibration and the association with anxiety. In males, there was a dose–response relationship at all degrees of exposure. However, in females, this relationship was only significant at a mild degree of exposure.

Table 4 Results of Degree of Noise and/or Vibration Exposure with Anxiety


This study used data from the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), to analyze the association between occupational noise and vibration exposure, and anxiety. Our findings suggest that exposure to noise, and to both noise and vibration, have a more prominent effect on anxiety than exposure to vibration alone.

Similar to previous studies [13], there was a significant positive relationship between anxiety and noise exposure. A study conducted in Egypt found that airport workers who had a higher occupational exposure to noise showed more prominent anxiety symptoms [14]. Further, this study found that combined noise and vibration had a significant influence on anxiety. This is in line with a previous study by Oldenburg [13], which showed that the occurrence of psycho-emotional strain increased significantly with exposure to noise and vibrations simultaneously. In addition, the prevalence of anxiety was higher in females than in males in our study. This is consistent with previous findings, which showed that women are more vulnerable to mental health problems than men [15]. However, the anxiety OR was higher in males than females in the noise exposure group, and the simultaneous noise and vibration exposure group. This could be owing to the fact that male participants are more likely to be exposed to hazardous occupational conditions than female participants, as reported in prior studies, and thus, the aftermath is more likely to be damaging among males [16].

Exposure to both noise and vibration can cause dysfunctions in both psychological and physical aspects linked to the nervous system [17]. Symptoms such as headache/eyestrain, fatigue, and insomnia are related to the nervous system disorders that are known to have connected mechanisms [18]. Persistent exposure can continuously agitate the autonomic nervous system, resulting in a sustained central autonomic activation and stimulation of sympathetic nervous activity. For nervous system-related symptoms, the peripheral nervous system induction could be a major risk factor [19]. As anxiety is linked with the autonomic nervous system involved in the human stress response, other symptoms could be different stressors, all contributing to the anxiety.

Our results showed higher anxiety among women in pink collar jobs. These characteristics can be attributed to job differences. In the case of females, many were working in pink-collar jobs [20]. Many pink-collar jobs are a part of the service sector, in which exposure to noise and vibration is frequent. For instance, telemarketers are continuously exposed to noise and vibration through the ringing of the phone., which could result in a higher chance of anxiety due to the work environment [21].

There was also an age difference observed between males and females. The probability of anxiety was higher among males below the age of 39. These could be owing to the fact that younger workers are likely required to undertake more difficult work compared to their seniors [22]. Additionally, previous studies have reported that well-being and mental health increases with age [23].

A dose–response relationship was seen in the variable of interest subgroup analysis, examining the relationship of exposure to noise or vibration with anxiety. Among males, the risk of anxiety increased with increased noise and vibration exposure, both individually and combined, signifying a dose–response relationship. This was observed at all levels of exposure. However, this was only observed at a milder degree of exposure among females. This may be explained by the findings of a previous study, which showed that even within the same jobs, females were less exposed to noise than males, owing to differences in tasks [24]. This is in line with the results of the current study. According to many prior studies, the synergistic effect of noise and vibration has been shown to impact on health outcomes, such as cognitive performance, hearing loss, and headache/eyestrain [25]. In animal studies, conducted by Hamernik, and in an experimental study conducted by Huang and Griffin [26], a prediction model was created for 24 healthy young people in order to examine the level of discomfort caused by exposure to continuous, whole-body vibration and noise. It was concluded that the negative psychological effects increased owing to the combination of noise and whole-body vibration, which included increased stress, discomfort, or strain [27].

This study has several limitations. First, as it is a cross-sectional survey, causalities could not be clearly confirmed. Second, the data were self-reported, and it was not possible to confirm the participants’ level of exposure, level of intensity, or the exact timeline of the noise and vibration. Owing to the question limitations, the exact decibels regarding noise exposure, or the exact amplitude, frequency, or duration regarding vibration, could not be observed. Third, the KWCS did not contain relevant information, such as drinking or smoking habits, and we were therefore unable analyze these factors. Fourthly, we could not investigate specific anxiety disorders, such as panic disorder, social phobia, and obsessive compulsive disorder [28]. It would be beneficial for further studies to include a more detailed examination of anxiety disorders in the context of occupational exposure to noise and vibrations. Fifthly, there could be different types of vibration, such as whole-body vibrations, or hand–arm vibrations, which were not considered in this study [25].

Despite its limitations, this study also has several strengths. Firstly, it used the most recent data available, which was nationally representative and collected through rigorous, systematic multistage sampling. Therefore, these results are representative of workers in Korea. Secondly, to our knowledge, this is the first study, in South Korea, to examine the relationship between exposure to noise and vibration and anxiety using KWCS data.


In conclusion, this study found an association between occupational noise and vibration exposure and anxiety. Additionally, noise exposure had a bigger influence on anxiety than vibration exposure. Simultaneous noise and vibration exposure increased the likelihood of anxiety. These findings suggest that more detailed regulations are needed to manage and reduce occupational noise and vibration to provide a safer environment for workers. Additional public health measures should be put in place regarding the mental health of workers who are frequently exposed to hazardous noise and vibration.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute website, [].



Korean working conditions survey


Odds ratio


Confidence interval


  1. American Psychological Association. Anxiety. [cited 2021 03.12]; Available from:

  2. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017. [cited 2021.03.11]; Available from:

  3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The survey of mental disorders in Korea.2016. [cited 2021.03.13]; Available from:

  4. Moore PV, Lusk SL. Noise exposures: effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss. AAOHN J. 1997;45(8):397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SW, et al. Estimated exposure population to hazardous workplace noise among Korean workers. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;28(4):416–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Griffin M. Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54(2):73–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffin M. Handbook of human vibration. Griffin. Academic Press, London. 1990;1–1008.

  8. Lee HS, Choi SB. Control and response characteristics of a magneto-rheological fluid damper for passenger vehicles. J Intel Mater Syst Struct. 2000;11(1):80–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Lee W, Won JU, Yoon JH, Seok H, Kim YK, et al. The relationship between occupational noise and vibration exposure and headache/eyestrain, based on the fourth Korean working condition survey (KWCS). PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim YS, Park J, Rhee KY, Kim HM. A comparison between the second Korean working conditions survey (KWCS) and the first KWCS. Saf Health Work. 2015;6(2):85–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, C. and S. Park. Changing factors of employee satisfaction with working conditions: an analysis of the Korean working conditions survey. Saf Health Work. 2021;12(3):324–338.

  12. Park JN, et al. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and related factors in Korean employees: the third Korean working conditions survey (2011). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(4):424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbasi M, Monnazzam MR, Zakerian SA, Mehri A, Khoshnoud MM, Yousefzadeh A. Effect of occupational noise-induced sleep disturbance on worker's health. Int Arch Health Sci. 2017;4(3):62–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beutel ME, Jünger C, Klein EM, Wild P, Lackner K, Blettner M, et al. Noise annoyance is associated with depression and anxiety in the general population-the contribution of aircraft noise. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pigott T. Gender differences in the epidemiology and treatment of anxiety disorders. J Clin Psychiatr. 1999;60(suppl 18):4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee W, Lee JG, Yoon JH, Lee JH. Relationship between occupational dust exposure levels and mental health symptoms among Korean workers. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fontes R, Ribeiro J, Gupta DS, Machado D, Lopes-Júnior F, Magalhães F, et al. Time perception mechanisms at central nervous system. Neurol Int. 2016;8(1):14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee S, Lee W, Roh J, Won JU, Yoon JH. Symptoms of nervous system related disorders among workers exposed to occupational noise and vibration in Korea. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(2):191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoon JH, Won JU, Lee W, Jung PK, Roh J. Occupational noise annoyance linked to depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation: a result from nationwide survey of Korea. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Barnes TD, Beall VD, Holman MR. Pink-collar representation and budgetary outcomes in US states. Legis Stud Q. 2020;46(1):119–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gumasing MJJ, Ilagan JG. A cross-sectional study on occupational risk factors of BPO agents in the Philippines. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bangkok, Thailand; 2019;827–36.

  22. Kuster AT, Kuster AC, Klaiklang R. Self-representations of quality of life and anxiety of blue-collar workers, Khon Kaen. Thail J Health Res. 2015;29(6):449–56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kossek EE, Baltes BB, Matthews RA. How work–family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Ind Organ Psychol. 2011;4(3):352–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Stokholm ZA, Erlandsen M, Schlünssen V, Basinas I, Bonde JP, Peters S, et al. A quantitative general population job exposure matrix for occupational noise exposure. Ann Work Exposures Health. 2020;64(6):604–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nari F, Kim YK, Kang SH, Park EC, Jang SI. Association between occupational noise and vibration exposure and insomnia among workers in Korea. Life. 2020;10(4):46.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang Y, Griffin MJ. The discomfort produced by noise and whole-body vertical vibration presented separately and in combination. Ergonomics. 2014;57(11):1724–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ljungberg JK, Neely G. Cognitive after-effects of vibration and noise exposure and the role of subjective noise sensitivity. J Occup Health. 2007;49(2):111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells A. Meta-cognition and worry: a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Cogn Psychother. 1995;23(3):301–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the OSHRI for providing the data.


This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number. HI20C1130).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.P. designed this study, performed statistical analysis, drafted and completed the manuscript. F.N. and W.J. contributed to the concept and design of the study and revised the manuscript. E.-C.P. and S.-I.J. conceived, designed and directed this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-In Jang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, M., Nari, F., Jeong, W. et al. Association between occupational noise and vibration and anxiety in the South Korean working population: a cross-sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol 17, 1 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: